Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21448759›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2011

Myocardial substrate and route of administration determine acute cardiac retention and lung bio-distribution of cardiosphere-derived cells.

Michael Bonios, John Terrovitis, Connie Y Chang, James M Engles, Takahiro Higuchi, Riikka Lautamäki, Jianhua Yu, James Fox, Martin Pomper, Richard L Wahl and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Imaging in Drug Discovery and Development.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stem Cell Monitoring with a Direct or Indirect Labeling Method.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BoniosJohns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Ave, Ross 871, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
John Terrovitis
Connie Y Chang
James M Engles
Takahiro Higuchi
Riikka Lautamäki
Jianhua Yu
James Fox
Martin Pomper
Richard L Wahl
Benjamin M Tsui
Brian O'Rourke
Frank M Bengel
Eduardo Marbán
M Roselle Abraham
Johns Hopkins University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Imaging of the Myocardial Microenvironment to Facilitate Stem Cell EngraftmentR01HL092985 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ABRAHAM, MARIA ROSELLE, WAHL, RICHARD LEO · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantification of acute myocardial retention and lung bio-distribution of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) following transplantation is important to improve engraftment. METHODS AND

resultsWe studied acute(1 hour) cardiac/lung retention in 4 groups (n = 25) of rats (normal--NL, acute ischemia-reperfusion--AI-RM, acute permanent ligation-PL, and chronic infarct by ischemia-reperfusion--CI-R) using intra-myocardial delivery, 1 group using intracoronary delivery (acute ischemia-reperfusion, AI-RC, n = 5) and 1 group using intravenous delivery (acute ischemia-reperfusion, AI-RV, n = 5) of CDCs by PET. Cardiac retention was similar in the NL, AI-RM, CI-R, and A-IRC groups (13.6% ± 2.3% vs. 12.0% ± 3.9% vs. 9.9 ± 2.8 vs. 15.4% ± 5.5%; P = NS), but higher in PL animals (22.9% ± 5.2%; P < .05). Low cardiac retention was associated with significantly higher lung activity in NL and AI-RM groups (43.3% ± 5.6% and 39.9% ± 9.3%), compared to PL (28.5% ± 5.9%), CI-R (20.2% ± 9.3%), and A-IRC (19.9% ± 5.6%) animals (P < .05 vs. AI-RM and NL). Lung activity was highest following intravenous CDC delivery (55.1% ± 9.3%, P < .001) and was associated with very low cardiac retention (0.8% ± 1.06%). Two-photon microscopy indicated that CDCs escaped to the lungs via the coronary veins following intra-myocardial injection.

conclusionsAcute cardiac retention and lung bio-distribution vary with the myocardial substrate and injection route. Intra-myocardially injected CDCs escape into the lungs via coronary veins, an effect that is more pronounced in perfused myocardium.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineFemaleLungMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMyocardial IschemiaOrgan SpecificityRadionuclide ImagingRatsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21448759
PMCPMC4334365
OpenAlexW2040718395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.