Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21448424›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2011

Diagnostic value of antigenemia assay for cytomegalovirus gastrointestinal disease in immunocompromised patients.

Naoyoshi Nagata, Masao Kobayakawa, Takuro Shimbo, Kazufusa Hoshimoto, Tomoyuki Yada, Takuji Gotoda, Junichi Akiyama, Shinichi Oka, Naomi Uemura

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cytomegalovirus infection and the gastrointestinal tract.Current gastroenterology reports · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naoyoshi NagataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. nnagata_ncgm@yahoo.co.jp
Masao Kobayakawa
Takuro Shimbo
Kazufusa Hoshimoto
Tomoyuki Yada
Takuji Gotoda
Junichi Akiyama
Shinichi Oka
Naomi Uemura
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the utility of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay for the diagnosis of CMV gastrointestinal disease (GID).

methodsOne hundred and thirty immunocompromised patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with a history of anti-CMV treatment and who had not undergone examination using the antigenemia assay were excluded. CMV-GID was defined as the detection of large cells with intranuclear inclusions alone or associated with granular cytoplasmic inclusions by biopsy. Biopsy sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemically stained with anti-CMV. We evaluated the association between CMV-GID and patient characteristics (symptoms, underlying disease, medication, leukocyte counts, and antigenemia assay). All patients were checked with an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test before endoscopic examination. White blood cell (WBC) counts were obtained from medical records within 1 wk of endoscopy. Leukopenia was defined as a total WBC count < 5000 cells/mm(3). For HIV patients, we also checked CD4+ counts from medical records.

resultsA total of 99 patients were retrospectively selected for analysis. Of the immunocompromised patients, 19 had malignant disease, 18 had autoimmune disease, 19 had disorders of biochemical homeostasis, three had undergone transplantation, and 45 had HIV infection. A total of 50 patients had received immunosuppressive therapy. No patients had inflammatory bowel disease. Fifty-five patients were diagnosed as having CMV-GID. Univariate analysis indicated an association between HIV infection, leukopenia, and positive antigenemia and CMV-GID (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that HIV infection and positive antigenemia were the only independent factors related to CMV-GID (P < 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of antigenemia for CMV-GID were 65.4%, 93.6%, 91.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, patients with leukopenia displayed low sensitivity and high specificity. Minimal differences in accuracy were seen among patients with or without leukopenia. HIV-infected patients displayed low sensitivity and high specificity. Accuracy barely differed between HIV-positive and -negative patients. In HIV-infected patients, CD4 count < 50 cells/μL resulted in low sensitivity and high specificity. Differences in accuracy among patients were minor, regardless of CD4 count. In patients who had undergone both quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigenemia assay, real-time PCR was slightly more accurate in terms of sensitivity than the antigenemia assay; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.312).

conclusionIf the antigenemia test is positive, endoscopic lesions are acceptable for the diagnosis of CMV-GID without biopsy. The accuracy is not affected by HIV infection and leukopenia. Either PCR or the antigenemia assay are valid.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAdultAgedAntigens, ViralCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntigens, ViralAntigenemia assayCytomegalovirusGastrointestinal diseaseHuman immunodeficiency virus infectionReal-time polymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID21448424
PMCPMC3063912
OpenAlexW1625247320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.