ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2011
Diagnostic value of antigenemia assay for cytomegalovirus gastrointestinal disease in immunocompromised patients.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- IgG4-Related Oesophageal Disease with Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Case Report.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The association between antigenemia, histology with immunohistochemistry, and mucosal PCR in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis with concomitant human cytomegalovirus infection.Journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Eosinophilic enteritis accompanied by cytomegalovirus disease: a case report.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Cytomegalovirus-associated esophagitis on early esophageal cancer in immunocompetent host: a case report.Gut pathogens · 2021Article
- Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Colon perforation due to antigenemia-negative cytomegalovirus gastroenteritis after liver transplantation: A case report and review of literature.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Colonic cytomegalovirus detection by mucosal PCR and antiviral therapy in ulcerative colitis.PloS one · 2017Article
- Characteristic endoscopic findings and risk factors for cytomegalovirus-associated colitis in patients with active ulcerative colitis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016Article
- Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay for detection of cytomegalovirus in stool samples from patients with ulcerative colitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- When is an Assay of Cytomegalovirus Antigenemia Useful in Detecting Cytomegalovirus Colitis?Intestinal research · 2015Article
- Usefulness of the cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay in patients with ulcerative colitis.Intestinal research · 2015Article
- Long-term follow-up of ulcerative colitis patients treated on the basis of their cytomegalovirus antigen status.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Assessment of antigenemia assay for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus gastrointestinal diseases in HIV-infected patients.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2013Article
- Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the rapid detection of porcine cytomegalovirus under field conditions.Virology journal · 2012Article
- Cytomegalovirus infection and the gastrointestinal tract.Current gastroenterology reports · 2012Review
- Fatal Colitis Associated with Immune-Related Adverse Events and Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome by Cytomegalovirus.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the utility of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay for the diagnosis of CMV gastrointestinal disease (GID).
methodsOne hundred and thirty immunocompromised patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with a history of anti-CMV treatment and who had not undergone examination using the antigenemia assay were excluded. CMV-GID was defined as the detection of large cells with intranuclear inclusions alone or associated with granular cytoplasmic inclusions by biopsy. Biopsy sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemically stained with anti-CMV. We evaluated the association between CMV-GID and patient characteristics (symptoms, underlying disease, medication, leukocyte counts, and antigenemia assay). All patients were checked with an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test before endoscopic examination. White blood cell (WBC) counts were obtained from medical records within 1 wk of endoscopy. Leukopenia was defined as a total WBC count < 5000 cells/mm(3). For HIV patients, we also checked CD4+ counts from medical records.
resultsA total of 99 patients were retrospectively selected for analysis. Of the immunocompromised patients, 19 had malignant disease, 18 had autoimmune disease, 19 had disorders of biochemical homeostasis, three had undergone transplantation, and 45 had HIV infection. A total of 50 patients had received immunosuppressive therapy. No patients had inflammatory bowel disease. Fifty-five patients were diagnosed as having CMV-GID. Univariate analysis indicated an association between HIV infection, leukopenia, and positive antigenemia and CMV-GID (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that HIV infection and positive antigenemia were the only independent factors related to CMV-GID (P < 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of antigenemia for CMV-GID were 65.4%, 93.6%, 91.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, patients with leukopenia displayed low sensitivity and high specificity. Minimal differences in accuracy were seen among patients with or without leukopenia. HIV-infected patients displayed low sensitivity and high specificity. Accuracy barely differed between HIV-positive and -negative patients. In HIV-infected patients, CD4 count < 50 cells/μL resulted in low sensitivity and high specificity. Differences in accuracy among patients were minor, regardless of CD4 count. In patients who had undergone both quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigenemia assay, real-time PCR was slightly more accurate in terms of sensitivity than the antigenemia assay; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.312).
conclusionIf the antigenemia test is positive, endoscopic lesions are acceptable for the diagnosis of CMV-GID without biopsy. The accuracy is not affected by HIV infection and leukopenia. Either PCR or the antigenemia assay are valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.