ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2011
Prognostic factors of T4 gastric cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Detection value of free cancer cells in peritoneal washing in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2016Pooled it
- Free intraperitoneal tumor cells and outcome in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2015Pooled it
- Delayed phase dual-energy CT for early peritoneal metastasis prediction: imaging phenotypes and tumor-stroma correlates in upfront gastrectomy candidates.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Article
- MAGEA11 promotes GC proliferation, migration, and invasion through activation of E2F1 transcriptional activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Effect of Extended Dissection of Lymph Nodes (D2plus) with Gastrectomy on the Clinical and Oncological Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients, Compared to a Standard Dissection (D2).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Risk stratification for predicting postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer by grade of venous invasion.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- CHPF promotes gastric cancer tumorigenesis through the activation of E2F1.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Surgery for Locally Advanced GIT Cancers Has Potentially Good Postoperative Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2020Article
- Prognostic Factors and Recurrence Patterns in T4 Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- Clinical impact of underutilization of adjuvant therapy in node positive gastric adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Article
- CA125 is a potential biomarker to predict surgically incurable gastric and cardia cancer: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2016Article
- Bursectomy and non-bursectomy D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer, initial experience from a single institution in China.World journal of surgical oncology · 2015Article
- Trends and results in treatment of gastric cancer over last two decades at single East European centre: a cohort study.BMC surgery · 2014Article
- Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of T4 gastric cancer patients without distant metastasis.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the prognostic factors of T4 gastric cancer patients without distant metastasis who could undergo potentially curative resection.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 71 consecutive patients diagnosed with T4 gastric cancer and who underwent curative gastrectomy at our institutions. The clinicopathological factors that could be associated with overall survival were evaluated. The cumulative survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons between the groups were performed using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model and a step-wise procedure.
resultsThe study patients comprised 53 men (74.6%) and 18 women (25.4%) aged 39-89 years (mean, 68.9 years). Nineteen patients (26.8%) had postoperative morbidity: pancreatic fistula developed in 6 patients (8.5%) and was the most frequent complication, followed by anastomosis stricture in 5 patients (7.0%). During the follow-up period, 28 patients (39.4%) died because of gastric cancer recurrence, and 3 (4.2%) died because of another disease or accident. For all patients, the estimated overall survival was 34.1% at 5 years. Univariate analyses identified the following statistically significant prognostic factors in T4 gastric cancer patients who underwent potentially curative resection: peritoneal washing cytology (P < 0.01), number of metastatic lymph nodes (P < 0.05), and venous invasion (P < 0.05). In multivariate analyses, only peritoneal washing cytology was identified as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 3.62, 95% CI = 1.37-9.57) for long-term survival.
conclusionPositive peritoneal washing cytology was the only independent poor prognostic factor for T4 gastric cancer patients who could be treated with potentially curative resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.