SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2011
Meta-analysis of immunohistochemical prognostic markers in resected pancreatic cancer.
Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Pringle maneuver on prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after liver resection: a meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic Biomarkers for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Umbrella Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of MET amplification and expression in gastric cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of smad4 immunohistochemistry in various cancers.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Can vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density be used as prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Pooled it
- High circulating VEGF level predicts poor overall survival in lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2013Pooled it
- A systematic review of vascular endothelial growth factor expression as a biomarker of prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Association of fascin-1 with mortality, disease progression and metastasis in carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Ki67 and P53 in Relation to Disease Progression in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Single Institution Analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of Bile Biomarkers for Malignant Biliary Stenosis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Phenotypic and Genetic Features of Pancreatic Malignancies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- High p53 Protein Level Is a Negative Prognostic Marker for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of Histone Acetyl Transferase 1 (HAT-1) and Inflammatory Signatures in Pancreatic Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Aberrant immunoexpression of p53 tumour-suppressor and Bcl-2 family proteins (Bcl-2 and Bax) in ameloblastomas and odontogenic keratocysts.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Article
- Effects of Lactoferrin Supplemented with Fermented Milk on Obesity-Associated Pancreatic Damage in Rats.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mutations in key driver genes of pancreatic cancer: molecularly targeted therapies and other clinical implications.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2021Review
- Article
- Anti-angiogenic effects of the blue-green alga Arthrospira platensis on pancreatic cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe potential prognostic value of several commonly investigated immunohistochemical markers in resected pancreatic cancer is variably reported. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature evaluating p53, p16, smad4, bcl-2, bax, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression as prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to conduct a subsequent meta-analysis to quantify the overall prognostic effect.
methodsRelevant literature was identified using Medline, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science. The primary end point was overall survival assessed on univariate analysis. Only studies analysing resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma were eligible for inclusion and the summary log(e) hazard ratio (logHR) and variance were pooled using an inverse variance approach. Evidence of heterogeneity was evaluated using the χ(2) test for heterogeneity and its impact on the meta-analysis was assessed by the I(2) statisic. Hazard ratios greater than one reflect adverse survival associated with positive immunostaining.
resultsVascular endothelial growth factor emerged as the most potentially informative prognostic marker (11 eligible studies, n=767, HR=1.51 (95% confidence interval, CI=1.18-1.92)) with no evidence of any significant publication bias (Egger's test, P=0.269). Bcl-2 (5 eligible studies, n=314, HR=0.51 (95% CI=0.38-0.68)), bax (5 studies, n=274, HR=0.63 (95% CI=0.48-0.83)) and p16 (3 studies, n=229, HR=0.63 (95% CI=0.43-0.92)) also returned significant overall survival differences, but in smaller patient series due to a lack of evaluable literature. Neither p53 (17 studies, n=925, HR=1.22 (95% CI=0.96-1.56)), smad4 (5 studies, n=540, HR=0.88 (95% CI=0.61-1.27)) nor EGFR (4 studies, n=250, HR=1.35 (95% CI=0.80-2.27)) was found to represent significant prognostic factors when analysing the pooled patient data. There was evidence of significant heterogeneity in four of the seven study groups.
conclusionThese results support the case for immunohistochemical expression of VEGF representing a significant and reproducible marker of adverse prognosis in resected pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.