Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21447838›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2011

Tobacco use by male prisoners under an indoor smoking ban.

Ross M Kauffman, Amy K Ferketich, David M Murray, Paul E Bellair, Mary Ellen Wewers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Lung Cancer Screening in the Incarcerated Population Through a Community Imaging Partnership.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cigarette Smoking Among Inmates by Race/Ethnicity: Impact of Excluding African American Young Adult Men From National Prevalence Estimates.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Smoke-free policies in U.S. Prisons and jails: A review of the literature.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An international smoking ban-how many lives will be saved?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ross M KauffmanDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. rmkauffm@iupui.edu
Amy K Ferketich
David M Murray
Paul E Bellair
Mary Ellen Wewers
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control ProgramR25CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Assessing Smoking and Tobacco in Ohio PrisonsR36DP001167 · DP · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KAUFFMAN, ROSS M. · 2007 to 2007
$38k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1R36DP001167-01NCI NIH HHS R25-CA117865-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost correctional facilities have implemented tobacco restrictions in an effort to reduce costs and improve prisoner health, but little has been done to evaluate the impact of these policy changes. Patterns of tobacco use among prisoners were explored to determine the impact of incarceration in a facility with an indoor smoking ban on tobacco use behaviors.

methodsRecently incarcerated male inmates (n = 200) were surveyed about their tobacco use prior to and during incarceration.

resultsTobacco use was prevalent prior to arrest (77.5%) and increased during incarceration (81.0%). Though the number of cigarette smokers increased during imprisonment, per-capita cigarette consumption declined by 7.1 cigarettes/day (p < .001). Despite widespread tobacco use, most participants recognized that smoking is a cause of lung cancer (96.0%) and heart disease (75.4%) and that it can be addicting (97.5%). Most tobacco users (70.0%) reported a desire to quit, with 63.0% saying they intended to try quitting in the next year.

conclusionsIndoor smoking bans do not promote cessation in prisons but may reduce the amount of tobacco consumed. Though smoking is commonplace in prisons, most prisoners recognize the risks involved and wish to quit. This creates an ideal setting for intervention. Evidence-based cessation assistance should be made freely available to all incarcerated smokers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAir Pollution, IndoorData CollectionHealth PolicyHumansMaleNicotianaOhioPrevalencePrisonersPrisonsSmokingSmoking PreventionTobacco Use Cessation

Identifiers

PMID21447838
PMCPMC3103718
OpenAlexW2113533663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.