Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21447711›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2011

Dynamic changes of edema and late gadolinium enhancement after acute myocardial infarction and their relationship to functional recovery and salvage index.

Erica Dall'Armellina, Nina Karia, Alistair C Lindsay, Theodoros D Karamitsos, Vanessa Ferreira, Matthew D Robson, Peter Kellman, Jane M Francis, Colin Forfar, Bernard D Prendergast and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) expert consensus for CMR imaging endpoints in clinical research: part I - analytical validation and clinical qualification.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for therapy monitoring in cardiomyopathies.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erica Dall'ArmellinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nina Karia
Alistair C Lindsay
Theodoros D Karamitsos
Vanessa Ferreira
Matthew D Robson
Peter Kellman
Jane M Francis
Colin Forfar
Bernard D Prendergast
Adrian P Banning
Keith M Channon
Rajesh K Kharbanda
Stefan Neubauer
Robin P Choudhury
National Institutes of Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701128Wellcome Trust 088291Wellcome Trust 090532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in the myocardium in acute ischemia are dynamic and complex, and the characteristics of myocardial tissue on cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the acute setting are not fully defined. We investigated changes in edema and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with serial imaging early after acute myocardial infarction, relating these to global and segmental myocardial function at 6 months. METHODS AND

resultsCardiovascular magnetic resonance scans were performed on 30 patients with ST-elevation--myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention at each of 4 time points: 12 to 48 hours; 5 to 7 days; 14 to 17 days; and 6 months. All patients showed edema at 24 hours. The mean volume of edema (% left ventricle) was 37±16 at 24 hours and 39±17 at 1 week, with a reduction to 24±13 (P<0.01) by 2 weeks. Myocardial segments with edema also had increased signal on LGE at 24 hours (κ=0.77; P<0.001). The volume of LGE decreased significantly between 24 hours and 6 months (27±15% versus 22±12%; P=0.002). Of segments showing LGE at 24 hours, 50% showed resolution by 6 months. In segments with such a reduction in LGE, 65% also showed improved wall motion (P<0.0001). The area of LGE measured at 6 months correlated more strongly with troponin at 48 hours (r=0.9; P<0.01) than LGE at 24 hours (r=0.7). The difference in LGE between 24 hours and 6 months had profound effects on the calculation of salvage index (26±21% at 24 hours versus 42±23% at 6 months; P=0.02).

conclusionsMyocardial edema is maximal and constant over the first week after myocardial infarction, providing a stable window for the retrospective evaluation of area at risk. By contrast, myocardial areas with high signal intensity in LGE images recede over time with corresponding recovery of function, indicating that acutely detected LGE does not necessarily equate with irreversible injury and may severely underestimate salvaged myocardium.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaGadoliniumMagnetic Resonance ImagingAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryEdema, CardiacFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumRecovery of FunctionVentricular FunctionContrast MediaGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID21447711
PMCPMC3098134
OpenAlexW2121706860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.