Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21447538›Full record

ReviewJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2012

CNS effects of CB2 cannabinoid receptors: beyond neuro-immuno-cannabinoid activity.

Emmanuel S Onaivi, Hiroki Ishiguro, Shanzhi Gu, Qing-Rong Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Fibromyalgia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cannabinoid CB2 receptors and hypersensitivity to methamphetamine: Vulnerability to schizophrenia.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel S OnaiviDepartment of Biology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA. onaivie@wpunj.edu
Hiroki Ishiguro
Shanzhi Gu
Qing-Rong Liu
University of Yamanashi · JPWilliam Paterson University · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two well characterized cannabinoid receptors (CBRs), CB1-Rs and CB2-Rs, with other candidates, such as GPR55, PPARs and vanilloid TRPV1 (VR1) receptors, which are either activated by cannabinoids and/or endocannabinoids (eCBs). The neuronal and functional expression of CB2-Rs in the brain has been much less well characterized in comparison with the expression of the ubiquitous CB1-Rs. CB2-Rs were previously thought to be predominantly expressed in immune cells in the periphery and were traditionally referred to as peripheral CB2-Rs. We and others have now demonstrated the expression of CB2-Rs in neuronal, glial and endothelial cells in the brain, and this warrants a re-evaluation of the CNS effects of CB2-Rs. In the present review we summarize our current understanding of CNR2 genomic structure, its polymorphic nature, subtype specificity, from mice to human subjects, and its variants that confer vulnerabilities to neuropsychiatric disorders beyond neuro-immuno-cannabinoid activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCannabinoidsCentral Nervous SystemHumansNeuronsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB2CannabinoidsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB2

Identifiers

PMID21447538
PMCPMC3388033
OpenAlexW2006321295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.