ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2011
Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin disk susceptibility for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute recommends that if both cefoxitin and oxacillin are tested against Staphylococcus aureus and either result is measured as resistant, the organism should be reported as oxacillin resistant. This indicates that discrepancies may be present between oxacillin and cefoxitin sensitivities in S. aureus. In this study, we aimed to investigate the discrepancy between oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility in S. aureus clinical isolates. Of 10,980 S. aureus isolates recovered from 2005 to 2010, 27 (0.3%) isolates with discordant results between oxacillin and cefoxitin were collected. Fourteen (oxacillin diameters 10-12 mm) of the 27 strains were susceptible (MICs = 0.5-2 μg/ml) and 13 (6-13 mm) were resistant (4->256 μg/ml) to oxacillin. The cefoxitin MICs of 14 oxacillin-susceptible and 13 oxacillin-resistant strains ranged between 4 and 8 and 8 to 32 μg/ml, respectively. Discrepancies were present between oxacillin and cefoxitin in S. aureus, and these strains should be further tested for oxacillin MICs and for the mecA gene or β-lactamase activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.