Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2011
Effect of different types of resistance exercise on arterial compliance and calf blood flow.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood flow restriction does not result in prolonged decrements in torque.European journal of applied physiology · 2013Trial
- Impact of Blood-Flow-Restricted Training on Arterial Functions and Angiogenesis-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Stimulation of the Vascular Endothelium and Angiogenesis by Blood-Flow-Restricted Exercise.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Analyses of physiological wrist tremor with increased muscle activity during bench press exercise.Journal of exercise nutrition & biochemistry · 2019Article
- The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Acute Cardiovascular and Hemodynamic Responses to Low Intensity Eccentric Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.Asian journal of sports medicine · 2016Article
- Cardiovascular response to bouts of exercise with blood flow restriction.Journal of physical therapy science · 2016Article
- Ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation improves pulsatile arterial hemodynamics: a pilot trial.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2014Article
- Cardiovascular reactivity, stress, and physical activity.Frontiers in physiology · 2013Review
- Effects of low-intensity concentric and eccentric exercise combined with blood flow restriction on indices of exercise-induced muscle damage.Interventional medicine & applied science · 2013Article
- Effects of cuff width on arterial occlusion: implications for blood flow restricted exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2012Article
- Blood flow restricted exercise and vascular function.International journal of vascular medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-intensity blood flow restricted (LI-BFR) resistance training has been shown to produce comparable increases in muscle hypertrophy to traditional high-intensity (HI) resistance training. However, a comparison of the acute vascular responses between the two types of exercise has not been made. The purpose of this study is to compare the acute vascular responses of HI, low-intensity (LI), and LI-BFR resistance exercise. Using a randomized, cross-over design, 11 young (28 ± 5 years) males completed three acute resistance exercise bouts (HI, LI and LI-BFR). Before (Pre), and starting at 15- and 45-min after each exercise bout, large (LAEI) and small (SAEI) artery compliance and calf blood flow were assessed. Calf blood flow was normalized per unit pressure as calf vascular conductance (CVC). Repeated measures (condition × time) ANOVA revealed a main time effect for LAEI and a main condition effect for SAEI. LAEI increased following exercise but returned to baseline at 45-min post. SAEI was greater during the HI condition compared to the LI or LI-BFR conditions. There was a significant condition × time interaction for CVC. CVC was elevated at 15- and 45-min post during the HI condition and at 15-min following the LI condition. CVC was not altered following the LI-BFR condition. These results suggest that HI, LI, and LI-BFR resistance exercise cause similar acute increases in large artery compliance but HI causes greater increases in small artery compliance and calf vascular conductance than LI or LI-BFR resistance exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.