Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21445553›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2011

High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion.

Niels Komen, Juliette Slieker, Peter de Kort, J H W de Wilt, Erwin van der Harst, Peter-Paul Coene, Martijn P Gosselink, Martijn Gosselink, Geert Tetteroo, Eelco de Graaf and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Gosselink, Martijn [corrected to Gosselink, Martijn P]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Niels KomenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. nielskomen@hotmail.com
Juliette Slieker
Peter de Kort
J H W de Wilt
Erwin van der Harst
Peter-Paul Coene
Martijn P Gosselink
Martijn Gosselink
Geert Tetteroo
Eelco de Graaf
Ton van Beek
Rene den Toom
Wouter van Bockel
Cees Verhoef
Johan F Lange
Erasmus MC · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLWaterlandziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth "high tie" (HT) and "low tie" (LT) are well-known strategies in rectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare colonic perfusion after HT to colonic perfusion after LT.

methodsPatients undergoing rectal resection for malignancy were included. Colonic perfusion was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry, immediately after laparotomy on the antimesenterial side of the colon segment that was to become the afferent loop (measurement A). This measurement was repeated after rectal resection (measurement B). The blood flow ratios (B/A) were compared between the HT group and the LT group.

resultsBlood flow was measured in 33 patients, 16 undergoing HT and 17 undergoing LT. Colonic blood flow slightly decreased in the HT group whereas the flow increased in the LT group. The blood flow ratio was significantly higher in the LT group (1.48 vs. 0.91; p = 0.04), independent of the blood pressure.

conclusionThis study shows the blood flow ratio to be higher in the LT group. This suggests that anastomoses may benefit from better perfusion when LT is performed.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalBlood CirculationBlood PressureFemaleHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedRectum

Identifiers

PMID21445553
PMCPMC3140934
OpenAlexW2102367455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.