Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21445077›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2011

Gene expression profiling in MDS and AML: potential and future avenues.

K Theilgaard-Mönch, J Boultwood, S Ferrari, K Giannopoulos, J M Hernandez-Rivas, A Kohlmann, M Morgan, B Porse, E Tagliafico, C M Zwaan and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pattern-recognition-based Sensor Arrays for Cell Characterization: From Materials and Data Analyses to Biomedical Applications.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Analysis ofOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

K Theilgaard-MönchBiotech Research and Innovation Centre & Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Boultwood
S Ferrari
K Giannopoulos
J M Hernandez-Rivas
A Kohlmann
M Morgan
B Porse
E Tagliafico
C M Zwaan
J Wainscoat
M M Van den Heuvel-Eibrink
K Mills
L Bullinger
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMedical University of Lublin · PLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DERigshospitalet · DKUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, the classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) already incorporate cytogenetic and molecular genetic aberrations in an attempt to better reflect disease biology. However, in many MDS/AML patients no genetic aberrations have been identified yet, and even within some cytogenetically well-defined subclasses there is considerable clinical heterogeneity. Recent advances in genomics technologies such as gene expression profiling (GEP) provide powerful tools to further characterize myeloid malignancies at the molecular level, with the goal to refine the MDS/AML classification system, incorporating as yet unknown molecular genetic and epigenetic pathomechanisms, which are likely reflected by aberrant gene expression patterns. In this study, we provide a comprehensive review on how GEP has contributed to a refined molecular taxonomy of MDS and AML with regard to diagnosis, prediction of clinical outcome, discovery of novel subclasses and identification of novel therapeutic targets and novel drugs. As many challenges remain ahead, we discuss the pitfalls of this technology and its potential including future integrative studies with other genomics technologies, which will continue to improve our understanding of malignant transformation in myeloid malignancies and thereby contribute to individualized risk-adapted treatment strategies for MDS and AML patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingClassificationForecastingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic Syndromes

Identifiers

PMID21445077
OpenAlexW2073359373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.