Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21444707›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates obtained through population-based surveillance in South Africa in 2002-2003 and 2007-2008.

Nelesh P Govender, Jaymati Patel, Marelize van Wyk, Tom M Chiller, Shawn R Lockhart, Group for Enteric, Respiratory and Meningeal Disease Surveillance in South Africa (GERMS-SA)

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antifungal Resistance in Cryptococcal Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of Advanced HIV Disease.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Leveraging a high resolution microfluidic assay reveals insights into pathogenic fungal spore germination.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nelesh P GovenderMycology Reference Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Private Bag X4, Sandringham 2131, South Africa. neleshg@nicd.ac.za
Jaymati Patel
Marelize van Wyk
Tom M Chiller
Shawn R Lockhart
Group for Enteric, Respiratory and Meningeal Disease Surveillance in South Africa (GERMS-SA)
National Health Laboratory Service · ZACenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

PHS HHS U60/CCU022088PHS HHS U62/PSO022901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptococcus neoformans is the most common cause of meningitis among adult South Africans with HIV infection/AIDS. Widespread use of fluconazole for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis and other HIV-associated opportunistic fungal infections in South Africa may lead to the emergence of isolates with reduced fluconazole susceptibility. MIC testing using a reference broth microdilution method was used to determine if isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole or amphotericin B had emerged among cases of incident disease. Incident isolates were tested from two surveillance periods (2002-2003 and 2007-2008) when population-based surveillance was conducted in Gauteng Province, South Africa. These isolates were also tested for susceptibility to flucytosine, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Serially collected isolate pairs from cases at several large South African hospitals were also tested for susceptibility to fluconazole. Of the 487 incident isolates tested, only 3 (0.6%) demonstrated a fluconazole MIC of ≥ 16 μg/ml; all of these isolates were from 2002-2003. All incident isolates were inhibited by very low concentrations of amphotericin B and exhibited very low MICs to voriconazole and posaconazole. Of 67 cases with serially collected isolate pairs, only 1 case was detected where the isolate collected more than 30 days later had a fluconazole MIC value significantly higher than the MIC of the corresponding incident isolate. Although routine antifungal susceptibility testing of incident isolates is not currently recommended in clinical settings, it is still clearly important for public health to periodically monitor for the emergence of resistance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCryptococcus neoformansDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFluconazoleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedSouth AfricaTime FactorsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID21444707
PMCPMC3101403
OpenAlexW2132641616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.