Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21443627›Full record

ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2011

The RLK/Pelle family of kinases.

Lindsey A Gish, Steven E Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. FirstFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsey A GishDepartment of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA.
Steven E Clark
Institut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique · FRUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Receptor-mediated signaling regulating stem cell fateR01GM062962 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLARK, STEVEN E · 2002 to 2009
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM62962-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RLK/Pelle class of proteins kinases is composed of over 600 members in Arabidopsis. Many of the proteins in this family are receptor-like kinases (RLK), while others have lost their extracellular domains and are found as cytoplasmic kinases. Proteins in this family that are RLKs have a variety of extracellular domains that drive function in a large number of processes, from cell wall interactions to disease resistance to developmental control. This review will briefly cover the major subclasses of RLK/Pelle proteins and their roles. In addition, two specific groups on RLKs will be discussed in detail, relating recent findings in Arabidopsis and how well these conclusions have been able to be translated to agronomically important species. Finally, some details on kinase activity and signal transduction will be addressed, along with the mystery of RLK/Pelle members lacking kinase enzymatic activity.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCrops, AgriculturalMultigene FamilyPhylogenyProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionArabidopsis ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID21443627
PMCPMC4657737
OpenAlexW2115460333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.