Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21443285›Full record

ReviewDrugs2011

Lenalidomide: a review of its use in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Lesley J Scott, Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: cost-effectiveness in patients with one prior therapy in England and Wales.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lesley J ScottAdis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In several countries, including the US and in Europe, oral lenalidomide in combination with oral dexamethasone is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who have received at least one prior antimyeloma therapy. The key therapeutic mechanisms of action of lenalidomide (a thalidomide analogue) reside in its immunomodulatory, antiproliferative and anti-angiogenic properties. In patients with multiple myeloma, lenalidomide has dual effects, exerting a direct antitumour response by inhibiting proliferation and by inducing apoptosis of tumour cells. Lenalidomide also acts to enhance the immune system by inducing the activation of immune effector cells, such as T cells and natural killer cells, and inducing cytokine production. In the pivotal MM-009 and MM-010 phase III registration trials, treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone was effective and had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in relapsed or refractory patients with multiple myeloma. In robust pharmacoeconomic analyses based on these trials, relative to dexamethasone, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment met the assumed willingness-to-pay threshold for cost effectiveness from the UK and Scottish healthcare payer perspective in this patient population. The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Scottish Medicines Consortium considered that the health economic case for lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment was demonstrated for patients who had received at least two prior antimyeloma therapies. In addition, in pharmacoeconomic analyses based on indirect comparisons of clinical efficacy, regulatory agencies in Norway and Sweden considered that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment was cost effective relative to bortezomib in patients who have received at least one prior antimyeloma therapy. Furthermore, compared with placebo plus dexamethasone, treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone significantly prolonged the median time to progression, increased overall response rates and prolonged overall survival, with significantly longer median time to progression and overall response rates observed for all subgroups of patients. Thus, combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone provides a valuable option for the treatment of relapsed or refractory adult patients with multiple myeloma.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCell ProliferationDexamethasoneHumansLenalidomideMultiple MyelomaRecurrenceThalidomideAntineoplastic AgentsDexamethasoneLenalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID21443285
OpenAlexW2314451736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.