ReviewDrugs2011
Lenalidomide: a review of its use in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lenalidomide treatment for multiple myeloma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Prolonged Low-Dose Administration of FDA-Approved Drugs for Non-Cancer Conditions: A Review of Potential Targets in Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Post-marketing safety of immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma: A pharmacovigilance investigation based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Phase 1 study of pomalidomide in children with recurrent, refractory, and progressive central nervous system tumors: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium trial.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2021Article
- Review
- Lenalidomide: A Review in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma as Maintenance Therapy After ASCT.Drugs · 2017Review
- Lenalidomide: a review of its continuous use in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not eligible for stem-cell transplantation.Drugs & aging · 2015Review
- Review
- Review
- Lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: cost-effectiveness in patients with one prior therapy in England and Wales.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2013Article
- Pomalidomide: first global approval.Drugs · 2013Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In several countries, including the US and in Europe, oral lenalidomide in combination with oral dexamethasone is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who have received at least one prior antimyeloma therapy. The key therapeutic mechanisms of action of lenalidomide (a thalidomide analogue) reside in its immunomodulatory, antiproliferative and anti-angiogenic properties. In patients with multiple myeloma, lenalidomide has dual effects, exerting a direct antitumour response by inhibiting proliferation and by inducing apoptosis of tumour cells. Lenalidomide also acts to enhance the immune system by inducing the activation of immune effector cells, such as T cells and natural killer cells, and inducing cytokine production. In the pivotal MM-009 and MM-010 phase III registration trials, treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone was effective and had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in relapsed or refractory patients with multiple myeloma. In robust pharmacoeconomic analyses based on these trials, relative to dexamethasone, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment met the assumed willingness-to-pay threshold for cost effectiveness from the UK and Scottish healthcare payer perspective in this patient population. The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Scottish Medicines Consortium considered that the health economic case for lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment was demonstrated for patients who had received at least two prior antimyeloma therapies. In addition, in pharmacoeconomic analyses based on indirect comparisons of clinical efficacy, regulatory agencies in Norway and Sweden considered that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment was cost effective relative to bortezomib in patients who have received at least one prior antimyeloma therapy. Furthermore, compared with placebo plus dexamethasone, treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone significantly prolonged the median time to progression, increased overall response rates and prolonged overall survival, with significantly longer median time to progression and overall response rates observed for all subgroups of patients. Thus, combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone provides a valuable option for the treatment of relapsed or refractory adult patients with multiple myeloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.