Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21442444›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular biology letters2011

The role of p63 in cancer, stem cells and cancer stem cells.

Marta Nekulova, Jitka Holcakova, Philip Coates, Borivoj Vojtesek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of ΔNp63β on cell cycle and apoptosis in T98G cells.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Paradoxical Role of Cellular Senescence in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta NekulovaMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 65653, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jitka Holcakova
Philip Coates
Borivoj Vojtesek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcription factor p63 has important functions in tumorigenesis, epidermal differentiation and stem cell self-renewal. The TP63 gene encodes multiple protein isoforms that have different or even antagonistic roles in these processes. The balance of p63 isoforms, together with the presence or absence of the other p53 family members, p73 and p53, has a striking biological impact. There is increasing evidence that interactions between p53-family members, whether cooperative or antagonistic, are involved in various cell processes. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of p63 in tumorigenesis, metastasis, cell migration and senescence. In particular, recent data indicate important roles in adult stem cell and cancer stem cell regulation and in the response of cancer cells to therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMiceNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsProtein IsoformsStem CellsTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor ProteinsProtein IsoformsTP63 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21442444
PMCPMC6275999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.