Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21442282›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2011

Multidisciplinary medication review: evaluation of a pharmaceutical care model for nursing homes.

Melanie Isabelle Brulhart, Joel Pierre Wermeille

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Do not PIMP my nursing home ride! The impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Prescribing on residents' emergency care use.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Daily Medication Management and Adherence in the Polymedicated Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Impact of pharmaceutical care on mental well-being and perceived health among community-dwelling individuals with type 2 diabetes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie Isabelle BrulhartPharmacie interjurassienne, Hospitals and Nursing homes of Jura and Jura bernois SA, Beausite 49, 2740 Moutier, Switzerland. melanie.brulhart@hjbe.ch
Joel Pierre Wermeille
Hôpital du Jura Bernois · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess implementation of a pharmaceutical care model for the multidisciplinary care of elderly patients in nursing homes.

settingProspective study, medication review, from January 2007 to December 2009 in ten nursing homes affiliated to the Pharmacie interjurassienne (PIJ), Switzerland.

methodMedication use data were collected and reviewed by a pharmacist, focusing on drug indication, dosing, side effects, renal/hepatic elimination and interactions. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were discussed face-to-face with the responsible physician and a nurse. The pharmaceutical care issues were formulated and medication interventions proposed during this meeting. DRPs and interventions were documented using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe scheme version 5.00 (PCNE V5.00). The economic impact of the service was estimated through a retrospective evaluation of annual drug costs. A satisfaction evaluation was conducted among practitioners and nurses.

main outcome measuresDRPs, interventions, treatment changes implemented.

resultsDrug therapy of 329 patients was reviewed. The number of medicines per patient ranged from 2 to 27 (mean 12.8). A total of 1,225 DRPs were detected and discussed with the physician and the nurse. Medication review led to 343 medical evaluations secondary to drug-drug interactions and 803 treatment adaptations: 373 drugs were stopped, 197 dosages changed, 95 instructions for use amended, 86 drug choices were altered, 35 drug formulations changed and 17 new drugs started. According to the Anatomical Classification System, the main classes involved in interventions were related to Alimentary tract and metabolism (n = 285), Nervous system (n = 189) and Cardiovascular system (n = 115). Since the outset of the PIJ, the annual drug costs decreased in nursing homes with medication review including a pharmacist, whereas it was stable in the other nursing homes. The satisfaction evaluation showed a very positive appreciation by practitioners and nurses.

conclusionThe study showed an efficient pharmaceutical care model, well accepted by physicians and nurses. It also indicated that for elderly patients, continuous drug review contributed to improved drug therapy, reduced unnecessary polypharmacy and reduced pharmaceutical costs.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAgedAged, 80 and overDrug InteractionsDrug Utilization ReviewFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHomes for the AgedHumansMaleNursing HomesPatient Care TeamPharmaceutical ServicesProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21442282
OpenAlexW1973019412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.