Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21441963›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2012

Similar outcomes using myeloablative vs reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant preparative regimens for AML or MDS.

S M Luger, O Ringdén, M-J Zhang, W S Pérez, M R Bishop, M Bornhauser, C N Bredeson, M S Cairo, E A Copelan, R P Gale and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05674539 (Reduced Intensity Conditioning With Fludarabine and Busulfan Versus Fludarabine and Melphalan Before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05674539 phase3enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Reduced Intensity Conditioning With Fludarabine and Busulfan Versus Fludarabine and Melphalan Before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Randomised, Multi-Center, Phase III Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRan2023 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia, Adult, Myelodysplastic Syndrome(MDS), Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationArmsFludarabine and Busulfan, Fludarabine and Melphalan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Phase I/II Trial of Dose-Escalated Busulfan Delivered by Prolonged Continuous Infusion in Allogeneic Transplant Patients.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Trial
  12. ABO mismatch is associated with increased nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Total lymphoid irradiation-antithymocyte globulin conditioning and allogeneic transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2014
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Dose intensification of busulfan in the preparative regimen is associated with improved survival: a phase I/II controlled, randomized study.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2013
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Phase I-II study of clofarabine-melphalan-alemtuzumab conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2012
    Trial

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

S M LugerAbramson Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
O Ringdén
M-J Zhang
W S Pérez
M R Bishop
M Bornhauser
C N Bredeson
M S Cairo
E A Copelan
R P Gale
S A Giralt
Z Gulbas
V Gupta
G A Hale
H M Lazarus
V A Lewis
M C Lill
P L McCarthy
D J Weisdorf
M A Pulsipher

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
PB vs. BMU01HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2001 to 2010
$63.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24-CA76518NHLBI NIH HHS 5U01HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069294PHS HHS HHSH234200637015C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and non-myeloablative (NMA)-conditioning regimens have been used for over a decade, their relative efficacy vs myeloablative (MA) approaches to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with AML and myelodysplasia (MDS) is unknown. We compared disease status, donor, graft and recipient characteristics with outcomes of 3731 MA with 1448 RIC/NMA procedures performed at 217 centers between 1997 and 2004. The 5-year univariate probabilities and multivariate relative risk outcomes of relapse, TRM, disease-free survival (DFS) and OS are reported. Adjusted OS at 5 years was 34, 33 and 26% for MA, RIC and NMA transplants, respectively. NMA conditioning resulted in inferior DFS and OS, but there was no difference in DFS and OS between RIC and MA regimens. Late TRM negates early decreases in toxicity with RIC and NMA regimens. Our data suggest that higher regimen intensity may contribute to optimal survival in patients with AML/MDS, suggesting roles for both regimen intensity and graft vs leukemia in these diseases. Prospective studies comparing regimens are needed to confirm this finding and determine the optimal approach to patients who are eligible for either MA or RIC/NMA conditioning.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21441963
PMCPMC3134582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.