Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21441954›Full record

ArticleOncogene2011

New model systems provide insights into Myc-induced transformation.

A R Wasylishen, A Stojanova, S Oliveri, A C Rust, A D Schimmer, L Z Penn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Image-Based Analysis of Protein Stability.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020
    Article
  8. Multiple direct interactions of TBP with the MYC oncoprotein.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. MicroRNA 28 controls cell proliferation and is down-regulated in B-cell lymphomas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A R WasylishenDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A Stojanova
S Oliveri
A C Rust
A D Schimmer
L Z Penn
University of Toronto · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

CIHR 87152-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of Myc to promote cellular transformation is well established; however, a better understanding of the mechanisms through which Myc mediates tumorigenesis is essential for the development of therapeutic approaches to target this potent oncoprotein. Structure-function studies in rodent fibroblast cells have provided the basis for much of our current understanding of these mechanisms. To build on these approaches, we have characterized three novel human cell line models of Myc-dependent transformation: MCF10A, SH-EP Tet21/N-Myc, and LF1/TERT/LT/ST cells. We have also evaluated Myc family proteins (c-Myc and L-Myc), a naturally occurring isoform of Myc (MycS), and a set of N-terminal domain mutants (ΔMBII, W135E, T58A) for their ability to promote anchorage-independent growth in these models. Taken together, these results provide the field with three new human cell-based models to study Myc activity, highlight the importance of cellular context, and challenge the paradigm that the ability of Myc to promote tumorigenesis is exclusively MBII-dependent.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticGenes, mycModels, GeneticCell Line, TransformedHumans

Identifiers

PMID21441954
PMCPMC3765156
OpenAlexW2162566840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.