Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21441845›Full record

GuidelinePlastic and reconstructive surgery2011

Managing late periprosthetic fluid collections (seroma) in patients with breast implants: a consensus panel recommendation and review of the literature.

Bradley Bengtson, Garry S Brody, Mitchell H Brown, Caroline Glicksman, Dennis Hammond, Hilton Kaplan, G Patrick Maxwell, Michael G Oefelein, Neal R Reisman, Scott L Spear and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Diagnostic dilemmas and pitfalls in ThinPrepDiagnostic cytopathology · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. An Uncommon Presentation of Breast Implant Rupture.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley BengtsonGrand Rapids, Mich.; Los Angeles, Goleta, and Irvine, Calif.; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sea Girt, N.J.; South Nashville, Tenn.; Houston, Texas; Washington, D.C., and Eugene, Ore. From the Bengtson Center for Aesthetics and Plastic Surgery; the Division of Plastic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California; private practice; the Center for Breast and Body Contouring; Allergan Medical; Maxwell Aesthetics; Allergan, Inc.; Baylor College of Medicine; Georgetown University Hospital; and Jewell Plastic Surgery Center.
Garry S Brody
Mitchell H Brown
Caroline Glicksman
Dennis Hammond
Hilton Kaplan
G Patrick Maxwell
Michael G Oefelein
Neal R Reisman
Scott L Spear
Mark L Jewell
Late Periprosthetic Fluid Collection after Breast Implant Working Group
Tenneco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this consensus is to establish an algorithm for the management of patients who develop a late or delayed periprosthetic fluid collection. A work group of practicing plastic surgeons and device industry physicians met periodically by teleconference and discussed issues pertinent to the diagnosis and management of late periprosthetic fluid collections in patients with breast implants. Based on these meetings, treatment recommendations and a treatment algorithm were prepared in association with an editorial assistant.

methodThe work group participants discussed optimal care approaches developed in their private practices and from evidence in the literature.

resultsThe consensus algorithm and treatment and management recommendations represent the consensus of the group.

conclusionsThe group concluded that late periprosthetic fluid collection (arbitrarily defined as occurring ≥ 1 year after implant) is an infrequently reported occurrence (0.1 percent) after breast implant surgery and that, at a minimum, management should include clinically indicated ultrasound-guided aspiration of fluid, with appropriate cultures and cytologic testing. Further evaluation and additional treatment is recommended for recurrence of periprosthetic fluid collection after aspiration, or clinical suspicion of infection or neoplasia.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast ImplantsFemaleHumansSeromaTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21441845
OpenAlexW2060221457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.