ArticleJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2011
The path from bench to bedside: considerations before starting the journey.
Article in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of the make-up and properties of in vitro models of the healthy and diseased blood-brain barrier.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Pooled it
- CRISPR-Cas9-mediated therapeutics: Current clinical trials and therapy approval landscape to treat human diseases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2017Article
- Novel team-based approaches to advance academic translational research.Clinical and translational science · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding of human biology has increased tremendously for the last several decades, yet the pace at which these discoveries have translated into new therapies for patients has been frustratingly stagnant. Universities and academic health centers, as the major recipients of public investment in biomedical science, have an obligation to translate new knowledge into applications that confer human benefit. However, translating fundamental discoveries into practical applications is expensive and involves highly regulated steps with which few academic scientists have experience. Challenges in engaging universities and academic health centers in translational research include building the appropriate infrastructures for human investigation, training and stabilizing the careers of young scientists and physicians interested in the requisite work, educating academic investigators about the regulatory requirements inherent in successful therapeutic discovery and development, and finding more efficient ways to match good ideas with adequate funding resources. The purpose of this article is to examine the early-stage drug development process and evaluate the role that academia could play in it. Because interest in early-stage drug development grows among academic investigators, the need for more integrated partnerships among academia, government, and industry has become increasingly apparent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.