Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21441481›Full record

ReviewAdvances in dental research2011

Epithelial cell innate response to Candida albicans.

J R Naglik, D Moyes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in dental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Lipid Transport byInfection and immunity · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Interactions BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J R NaglikDepartment of Oral Immunology, Dental Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. julian.naglik@kcl.ac.uk
D Moyes

Funding

The oral mucosal proteome: perturbation in HIV infection and Candida co infectionR01DE017514 · NIDCR · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI CHALLACOMBE, STEPHEN J · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE017514NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of treatments and diseases such as AIDS resulting in increasing numbers of patients with suppressed immune systems, fungal diseases are an escalating problem. Candida albicans is the most common of these fungal pathogens, causing infections in many of these patients. It is therefore important to understand how immunity to this fungus is regulated and how it might be manipulated. Although work has been done to identify the receptors, fungal moieties, and responses involved in anti-Candida immunity, most studies have investigated interactions with myeloid or lymphoid cells. Given that the first site of contact of C. albicans with its host is the mucosal epithelial surface, recent studies have begun to focus on interactions of C. albicans with this site. The results are startling yet in retrospect obvious, indicating that epithelial cells play an important role in these interactions, initiating responses and even providing a level of protection. These findings have obvious implications, not just for fungal pathogens, but also for identifying how host organisms can distinguish between commensal and pathogenic microbes. This review highlights some of these recent findings and discusses their importance in the wider context of infection and immunity.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateCandida albicansCytokinesEpithelial CellsHumansInflammation MediatorsModels, ImmunologicalNeutrophil ActivationReceptors, Pattern RecognitionSignal TransductionCytokinesInflammation MediatorsReceptors, Pattern Recognition

Identifiers

PMID21441481
PMCPMC3144045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.