Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21440503›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2011

Temsirolimus and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a phase 2 study.

Stephen M Ansell, Hui Tang, Paul J Kurtin, Patricia A Koenig, David J Inwards, Keith Shah, Steven C Ziesmer, Andrew L Feldman, Radha Rao, Mamta Gupta and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00109967 (A Phase II Study of CCI-779 in Combination With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00109967 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Study of CCI-779 in Combination With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2005 to 2012Enrolled71ConditionsRecurrent Mantle Cell LymphomaArmsrituximab, temsirolimus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Oral mucosal changes induced by anticancer targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephen M AnsellDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. ansell.stephen@mayo.edu
Hui Tang
Paul J Kurtin
Patricia A Koenig
David J Inwards
Keith Shah
Steven C Ziesmer
Andrew L Feldman
Radha Rao
Mamta Gupta
Charles Erlichman
Thomas E Witzig

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
Biologic therapy for Beta-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomaR01CA092104 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ANSELL, STEPHEN M · 2002 to 2011
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA25224NCI NIH HHS CA92104NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092104NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTemsirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor with single-agent antitumour activity in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. We therefore tested its efficacy and toxicity in combination with rituximab (an antiCD20 antibody) in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

methodsIn a phase 2 study, patients (aged ≥18 years) at 35 centres in the USA were given temsirolimus 25 mg/week, and rituximab 375 mg/m(2) per week for 4 weeks during the first cycle and thereafter a single dose of rituximab every other 28-day cycle. Both drugs were administered intravenously. Responding patients after six cycles could continue treatment for a total of 12 cycles, and were then observed without additional maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with either rituximab-sensitive or rituximab-refractory disease who had at least a partial response. The analyses were done on all patients who were treated. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00109967.

findings71 patients with mantle cell lymphoma were enrolled and 69 were assessable and were included in the final analysis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 59% (41 of 69 patients)-13 (19%) patients had complete responses and 28 (41%) had partial responses. The ORR was 63% (30 of 48; 95% CI 47-76) for rituximab-sensitive patients, and 52% (11 of 21; 30-74) for rituximab-refractory patients. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events in rituximab-sensitive and rituximab-refractory patients were thrombocytopenia (eight [17%] and eight [38%], respectively), neutropenia (ten [21%] and five [24%], respectively), fatigue (eight [17%] and two [10%], respectively), leucopenia (six [13%] and three [14%], respectively), pneumonia (five [10%] and two [10%], respectively), lymphopenia (five [10%] and two [10%], respectively), pneumonitis (four [8%] and none, respectively), oedema (four [8%] and none, respectively), dyspnoea (three [6%] and two [10%], respectively), and hypertriglyceridaemia (three [6%] and two [10%], respectively).

interpretationmTOR inhibitors in combination with rituximab could have a role in the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

fundingNational Institutes of Health and the Predolin Foundation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansLymphoma, Mantle-CellMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRituximabSirolimusAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedRituximabSirolimustemsirolimus

Identifiers

PMID21440503
PMCPMC3106222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.