Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21440002›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2011

Targeting autophagy during cancer therapy to improve clinical outcomes.

Jean M Mulcahy Levy, Andrew Thorburn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Assessing Autophagy Flux in Glioblastoma Temozolomide Resistant Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Versatile function of NF-ĸB in inflammation and cancer.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Autophagy Regulators in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jean M Mulcahy LevyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, 12801 E 17th Ave, RC-1 South, Rm 6400D, Mail Stop 8303, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Andrew Thorburn

Funding

Role of autophagy in tumor cell deathR01CA150925 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DEGREGORI, JAMES V · 2010 to 2024
$5.5M
FADD Signaling in Cancer CellsR01CA111421 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI THORBURN, ANDREW M · 2005 to 2014
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA111421NCI NIH HHS CA150925NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111421NCI NIH HHS R01 CA150925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a catabolic process that turns over long-lived proteins and organelles and contributes to cell and organism survival in times of stress. Current cancer therapies including chemotherapy and radiation are known to induce autophagy within tumor cells. This is therefore an attractive process to target during cancer therapy as there are safe, clinically available drugs known to both inhibit and stimulate autophagy. However, there are conflicting positive and negative effects of autophagy and no current consensus on how to manipulate autophagy to improve clinical outcomes. Careful and rigorous evaluation of autophagy with a focus on how to translate laboratory findings into relevant clinical therapies remains an important aspect of improving clinical outcomes in patients with malignant disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAutophagyHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID21440002
PMCPMC3539744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.