Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21439813›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2011

DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution.

Stephen C J Parker, Thomas D Tullius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recruitment of CRISPR-Cas systems by Tn7-like transposons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen C J ParkerGenome Informatics Section, Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Thomas D Tullius
Boston University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Structure of genomic DNA at single-nucleotide resolutionR01HG003541 · NHGRI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI TULLIUS, THOMAS D · 2004 to 2010
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHSNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the three-letter genetic code that maps nucleotide sequence to protein sequence is well known, there must exist other codes that are embedded in the human genome. Recent work points to sequence-dependent variation in DNA shape as one mechanism by which regulatory and other information could be encoded in DNA. Recent advances include the discovery of shape-dependent recognition of DNA that depends on minor groove width and electrostatics, the existence of overlapping codes in protein-coding regions of the genome, and evolutionary selection for compensatory changes in nucleotide composition that facilitate nucleosome occupancy. It is becoming clear that DNA shape is important to biological function, and therefore will be subject to evolutionary constraint.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic CodeAnimalsBase SequenceDNAGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomeHumansNucleosomesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNANucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID21439813
PMCPMC3112471
OpenAlexW1996815852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.