Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21439043›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2011

Number and timing of antenatal HIV testing: evidence from a community-based study in Northern Vietnam.

Nguyen T T Hanh, Tine M Gammeltoft, Vibeke Rasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Socioeconomic Inequalities in the HIV Testing during Antenatal Care in Vietnamese Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brief Report: HIV Testing Among Pregnant Women Who Attend Antenatal Care in Malawi.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Predictors of unknown HIV serostatus at the time of labor and delivery in Kampala, Uganda.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nguyen T T HanhDepartment of Population, Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, No 1 Ton That Tung Street, Khuong Thuong, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam. n_thuyhanh@yahoo.com
Tine M Gammeltoft
Vibeke Rasch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV testing for pregnant women is an important component for the success of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT). A lack of antenatal HIV testing results in loss of benefits for HIV-infected mothers and their children. However, the provision of unnecessary repeat tests at a very late stage of pregnancy will reduce the beneficial effects of PMTCT and impose unnecessary costs for the individual woman as well as the health system. This study aims to assess the number and timing of antenatal HIV testing in a low-income setting where PMTCT programmes have been scaled up to reach first level health facilities.

methodsA cross-sectional community-based study was conducted among 1108 recently delivered mothers through face-to-face interviews following a structured questionnaire that focused on socio-economic characteristics, experiences of antenatal care and HIV testing.

resultsThe prevalence of women who lacked HIV testing among the study group was 10% while more than half of the women tested had had more than two tests during pregnancy. The following factors were associated with the lack of antenatal HIV test: having two children (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4), living in a remote rural area (aOR 7.8, 95% CI 3.4-17.8), late antenatal care attendance (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.1) and not being informed about PMTCT at their first antenatal care visits (aOR 7.4, 95% CI 2.6-21.1). Among women who had multiple tests, 80% had the second test after 36 weeks of gestation. Women who had first ANC and first HIV testing at health facilities at primary level were more likely to be tested multiple times (OR 2.9 95% CI 1.9-4.3 and OR = 4.7 95% CI 3.5-6.4), respectively.

conclusionsNot having an HIV test during pregnancy was associated with poor socio-economic characteristics among the women and with not receiving information about PMTCT at the first ANC visit. Multiple testing during pregnancy prevailed; the second tests were often provided at a late stage of gestation.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdolescentAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID21439043
PMCPMC3078880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.