Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21438693›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2011

Efficacy of three vaccines in protecting Western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica) from experimental infection with West Nile virus: implications for vaccination of Island Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma insularis).

Sarah S Wheeler, Stanley Langevin, Leslie Woods, Brian D Carroll, Winston Vickers, Scott A Morrison, Gwong-Jen J Chang, William K Reisen, Walter M Boyce

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A review of vaccine approaches for West Nile virus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah S WheelerCenter for Vectorborne Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Stanley Langevin
Leslie Woods
Brian D Carroll
Winston Vickers
Scott A Morrison
Gwong-Jen J Chang
William K Reisen
Walter M Boyce
University of California, Davis · USCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture · USThe Nature Conservancy · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Persistence of West Nile virus in CaliforniaR01AI055607 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI REISEN, WILLIAM K · 2003 to 2012
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI55607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The devastating effect of West Nile virus (WNV) on the avifauna of North America has led zoo managers and conservationists to attempt to protect vulnerable species through vaccination. The Island Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma insularis) is one such species, being a corvid with a highly restricted insular range. Herein, we used congeneric Western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica) to test the efficacy of three WNV vaccines in protecting jays from an experimental challenge with WNV: (1) the Fort Dodge West Nile-Innovator(®) DNA equine vaccine, (2) an experimental DNA plasmid vaccine, pCBWN, and (3) the Merial Recombitek(®) equine vaccine. Vaccine efficacy after challenge was compared with naïve and nonvaccinated positive controls and a group of naturally immune jays. Overall, vaccination lowered peak viremia compared with nonvaccinated positive controls, but some WNV-related pathology persisted and the viremia was sufficient to possibly infect susceptible vector mosquitoes. The Fort Dodge West Nile-Innovator DNA equine vaccine and the pCBWN vaccine provided humoral immune priming and limited side effects. Five of the six birds vaccinated with the Merial Recombitek vaccine, including a vaccinated, non-WNV challenged control, developed extensive necrotic lesions in the pectoral muscle at the vaccine inoculation sites, which were attributed to the Merial vaccine. In light of the well-documented devastating effects of high morbidity and mortality associated with WNV infection in corvids, vaccination of Island Scrub-Jays with either the Fort Dodge West Nile-Innovator DNA vaccine or the pCBWN vaccine may increase the numbers of birds that would survive an epizootic should WNV become established on Santa Cruz Island.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralAutopsyBird DiseasesBirdsCaliforniaDisease Models, AnimalImmunohistochemistryVaccinationWest Nile FeverWest Nile virusWest Nile Virus VaccinesAntibodies, ViralWest Nile Virus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21438693
PMCPMC3151624
OpenAlexW2084953048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.