Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21437575›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2011

Cardiac cell therapy: the next (re)generation.

Elvira Forte, Isotta Chimenti, Lucio Barile, Roberto Gaetani, Francesco Angelini, Vittoria Ionta, Elisa Messina, Alessandro Giacomello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Stem Cell Spheroids and Ex Vivo Niche Modeling: Rationalization and Scaling-Up.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cardiovascular Regenerative Technologies: Update and Future Outlook.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elvira ForteDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Pasteur Institute, Cenci-Bolognetti Foundation, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Isotta Chimenti
Lucio Barile
Roberto Gaetani
Francesco Angelini
Vittoria Ionta
Elisa Messina
Alessandro Giacomello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure remains one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Current therapies for myocardial infarction are mostly aimed at blocking the progression of the disease, preventing detrimental cardiac remodeling and potentiating the function of the surviving tissue. In the last decade, great interest has arisen from the possibility to regenerate lost tissue by using cells as a therapeutic tool. Different cell types have been tested in animal models, including bone marrow-derived cells, myoblasts, endogenous cardiac stem cells, embryonic cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. After the conflicting and often inconsistent results of the first clinical trials, a step backward needs to be performed, to understand the basic biological mechanisms underlying spontaneous and induced cardiac regeneration. Current studies aim at finding new strategies to enhance cellular homing, survival and differentiation in order to improve the overall outcome of cellular cardiomyoplasty.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationRegenerationAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell LineageCell SurvivalClinical Trials as TopicEmbryonic Stem CellsHeartHeart DiseasesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMuscle, SkeletalMyoblasts, CardiacStem Cell TransplantationTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.