Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21437266›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Origin-dependent inverted-repeat amplification: a replication-based model for generating palindromic amplicons.

Bonita J Brewer, Celia Payen, M K Raghuraman, Maitreya J Dunham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA Replication Errors Drive Genome-Wide Small Inverted Triplication Dynamics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Fast and accurate resolution of ecDNA sequence using Cycle-Extractor.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Telomeric amplicons ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bonita J BrewerDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. bbrewer@gs.washington.edu
Celia Payen
M K Raghuraman
Maitreya J Dunham

Funding

EUKARYOTIC CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE AND REPLICATIONR01GM018926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BREWER, BONITA J · 1985 to 2016
$6.8M
EUKARYOTIC CHROMOSOME REPLICATIONR37GM018926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FANGMAN, WALTON L · 1995 to 2004
$2.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCESF31GM018926 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI RODRIGUES, PAULA D · 1997 to 2001
$46k
NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM018926NIGMS NIH HHS GM018926NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM018926NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM018926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAnion Transport ProteinsDNA ReplicationGene AmplificationGene RearrangementHumansInverted Repeat SequencesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReplication OriginSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSulfate TransportersAnion Transport ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSUL1 protein, S cerevisiaeSulfate Transporters

Identifiers

PMID21437266
PMCPMC3060070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.