Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21437176›Full record

ArticleSarcoma2011

Spinal chondrosarcoma: a review.

Pavlos Katonis, Kalliopi Alpantaki, Konstantinos Michail, Stratos Lianoudakis, Zaharias Christoforakis, George Tzanakakis, Apostolos Karantanas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sarcoma, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TotalAnnals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Imaging of Malignant Primitive Tumors of the Spine.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavlos KatonisUniversity Hospital, University of Crete, Heraklion 711 10, Greece.
Kalliopi Alpantaki
Konstantinos Michail
Stratos Lianoudakis
Zaharias Christoforakis
George Tzanakakis
Apostolos Karantanas
University of Crete · GRUniversity Hospital of Heraklion · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondrosarcoma is the third most common primary malignant bone tumor. Yet the spine represents the primary location in only 2% to 12% of these tumors. Almost all patients present with pain and a palpable mass. About 50% of patients present with neurologic symptoms. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are generally unsuccessful while surgical resection is the treatment of choice. Early diagnosis and careful surgical staging are important to achieve adequate management. This paper provides an overview of the histopathological classification, clinical presentation, and diagnostic procedures regarding spinal chondrosarcoma. We highlight specific treatment modalities and discuss which is truly the most suitable approach for these tumors. Abstracts and original articles in English investigating these tumors were searched and analyzed with the use of the PubMed and Scopus databases with "chondrosarcoma and spine" as keywords.

Identifiers

PMID21437176
PMCPMC3061459
OpenAlexW2092818017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.