Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21437040›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2010

Controversial data on simvastatin in asthma: What about the rat model?

Thomas Tschernig, Wolfgang Bäumer, Reinhard Pabst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Repurposing drug molecules for new pulmonary therapeutic interventions.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Innovations in asthma therapy: is there a role for inhaled statins?Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas TschernigInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover.
Wolfgang Bäumer
Reinhard Pabst
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of simvastatin on lung inflammation in asthma are controversial. Reduction of inflammation and hyperreactivity has been reported in studies using murine models of asthma. In contrast, a clinical study has not found beneficial effects in patients. The rat model of asthma has some distinct advantages and is still widely used in industrial studies. Therefore, the role of simvastatin was investigated in this rat model using intraperitoneal and intratracheal administration. With both simvastatin administration routes, the relative and absolute numbers of neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes were only partially reduced after increasing dosages (0.1, 1.0, and 10 mg per animal). The most obvious effect was on CD4 T cell numbers, which were reduced in most treatment groups. The results presented here suggest that treatment with simvastatin differs between species, and that it is too early for extrapolation of these data to humans.

Indexed as

asthmainflammationratsimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID21437040
PMCPMC3047916
OpenAlexW2074073723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.