ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2010
Report of the 2009-2010 Professional Affairs Committee: pharmacist integration in primary care and the role of academic pharmacy.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician-pharmacist collaborative practice and telehealth may transform hypertension management.Journal of human hypertension · 2019Review
- Report of the 2014-2015 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Producing Practice-Ready Pharmacy Graduates in an Era of Value-Based Health Care.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2015Article
- Report of the 2010-2011 Professional Affairs Committee: Effective partnerships to implement pharmacists' services in team-based, patient-centered healthcare.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011Article
- Roles of the Pharmacy Academy in informing consumers about the new American pharmacist: 2010-2011 Argus Commission Report.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011Article
- Call to action: expansion of pharmacy primary care services in a reformed health system.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2010Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.