Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21435661›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2011

A recommended laparoscopic procedure for implantation of microcapsules in the peritoneal cavity of non-human primates.

Meirigeng Qi, Igor Lacik, Gabriela Kolláriková, Berit L Strand, Kjetil Formo, Yong Wang, Enza Marchese, Joshua E Mendoza-Elias, Katie P Kinzer, Francesca Gatti and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Simultaneous spatiotemporal tracking and oxygen sensing of transient implants in vivo using hot-spot MRI and machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Encapsulated Islet Transplantation: Where Do We Stand?The review of diabetic studies : RDS · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Meirigeng QiDepartment of Surgery/Division of Transplantation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Igor Lacik
Gabriela Kolláriková
Berit L Strand
Kjetil Formo
Yong Wang
Enza Marchese
Joshua E Mendoza-Elias
Katie P Kinzer
Francesca Gatti
Daniel Paushter
Sonny Patel
Jose Oberholzer
University of Illinois Chicago · USSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

CHICAGO ISLET CONSORTIUM ICR AT UICU42RR023245 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI OBERHOLZER, JOSE · 2006 to 2008
$3.2M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 U42 RR023245-01NCRR NIH HHS U42 RR023245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anatomical spatial distribution of microencapsulated islets transplanted into the peritoneal cavity of large animals remains a relatively unexplored area of study. In this study, we developed a new implantation approach using laparoscopy in order to avoid microcapsule amalgamation. This approach constitutes a clinically relevant method, which can be used to evaluate the distribution and in vivo biocompatibility of various types of transplanted microcapsules in the future. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo healthy baboons were implanted intraperitoneally with microencapsulated islets through mini-laparotomy and observed at 76 d after implantation. Nine baboons underwent laparoscopic implantation of approximately 80,000 empty microcapsules. Microcapsule distribution was observed by laparoscopic camera during and after implantation at 1, 2, and 4 wk. At each time point, microcapsules were retrieved and evaluated with brightfield microscopy and histologic analysis.

resultsMini-laparotomic implantation resulted in microcapusle aggregation in both baboons. In contrast, laparoscopic implantation resulted in even distribution of microcapsules throughout the peritoneum without sedimentation to the Douglas space in all animals. In eight out of nine animals, retrieved microcapsules were evenly distributed in the peritoneal cavity and presented with no pericapsular overgrowth and easily washed out during laparoscopic procedure. The one exception was attributed to microcapsule contamination with blood from the abdominal wall following trocar insertion.

conclusionsLaparoscopic implantation of microcapsules in non-human primates can be successfully performed and prevents microcapsule aggregation. Given the current widespread clinical application of laparoscopy, we propose that this presented laparoscopy technique could be applied in future clinical trials of microencapsulated islet transplantation.

Indexed as

CapsulesAnimalsFemaleIslets of Langerhans TransplantationLaparoscopyMaleModels, AnimalPapio anubisPeritoneal CavityTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCapsules

Identifiers

PMID21435661
PMCPMC3661273
OpenAlexW2042735443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.