ArticleNeuron2011
Olfactory bulb: odor signals put into context.
Article in Neuron, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Olfactory-trigeminal integration in the primary olfactory cortex.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Hypotheses relating to the function of the claustrum.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue, Doucette and colleagues demonstrate that information related to whether an odor is currently linked to reward can be observed uniquely in population activity in the olfactory bulb, changing our understanding both of what is coded by the first olfactory relay in the CNS and of how this coding is instantiated.
Identifiers
21435550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.