Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21435434›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of pathology2011

Assessment of Topoisomerase II α status in breast cancer by quantitative PCR, gene expression microarrays, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Atocha Romero, Miguel Martín, Maggie C U Cheang, José Antonio López García-Asenjo, Belén Oliva, Xiaping He, Miguel de la Hoya, Jose Ángel García Sáenz, Manuel Arroyo Fernández, Eduardo Díaz Rubio and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of pathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Assignment of tumor subtype by genomic testing and pathologic-based approximations: implications on patient's management and therapy selection.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2014
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Expression of the Topoisomerase II Alpha (TOP2A) Gene in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells and the Association with Patient Outcomes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patient withCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Atocha RomeroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Martín
Maggie C U Cheang
José Antonio López García-Asenjo
Belén Oliva
Xiaping He
Miguel de la Hoya
Jose Ángel García Sáenz
Manuel Arroyo Fernández
Eduardo Díaz Rubio
Charles M Perou
Trinidad Caldés Llopis
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAgencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias · ESUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthracyclines are frequently used for the treatment of breast cancer and topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) is considered to be the molecular target. Numerous studies have evaluated the predictive value of TOP2A using different methodological approaches and inconsistent results have been reported. Indeed, the correlation between techniques for the assessment of TOP2A status has not been well evaluated. In this study, we determined TOP2A status in 61 breast tumor samples by real-time PCR, DNA microarrays, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and then evaluated these results with clinical-pathological features and breast cancer intrinsic subtypes. First, we observed a statistical significant correlation of TOP2A gene expression between real-time PCR and microarrays (Pearson coefficient, 0.816; P < 0.001), and both predicted TOP2A IHC results fairly well (area under the curve > 0.74). In contrast, poor agreement between FISH and IHC data was observed (k: 0.134). Secondly, TOP2A expression was found significantly associated with cell proliferation, and with the highly proliferative Luminal B, Her2-enriched and Basal-like intrinsic subtypes. In conclusion, TOP2A expression in breast cancer was associated with high proliferation and aggressive tumor subtypes and appears to be independent of its amplification status. All of these features should be taken into consideration when assessing the predictive value of TOP2A for anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAntigens, NeoplasmDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsTOP2A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21435434
PMCPMC3078442
OpenAlexW2130246000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.