Genetic enhancement in sports: The role of reason and private rationalities in the public arena.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Epigenetic Modulation of Exercise Adaptation: The Role of Dietary Supplementation in Athletic Performance.Genes · 2026
   Review
2. Ethical Concerns in Sport: When the Will to Win Exceed the Spirit of Sport.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
   Review
3. Rationality and the genetic challenge revisited.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as