ReviewBMC health services research2011
Building effective service linkages in primary mental health care: a narrative review part 2.
Review in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitioning from child and adolescent psychiatry to follow-up care: a concept mapping study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Understanding the Oral Health Status and Factors Affecting Poor Oral Health in People Living With Severe Mental Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study.Australian dental journal · 2026Article
- Professional perspectives on roles and structural gaps in interprofessional collaboration for suicide prevention: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Barriers and Opportunities for Collaboration With Primary Care: Perspectives of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs in Ontario, Canada.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
- An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Bridging the mental health treatment gap: effects of a collaborative care intervention (matrix support) in the detection and treatment of mental disorders in a Brazilian city.Family medicine and community health · 2020Article
- Interagency collaboration in primary mental health care: lessons from the Partners in Recovery program.International journal of mental health systems · 2019Article
- Strengthening primary health care through primary care and public health collaboration: the influence of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors.Primary health care research & development · 2018Article
- A clustered controlled trial of the implementation and effectiveness of a medical home to improve health care of people with serious mental illness: study protocol.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- [Implementation and operation of protected residences for people with serious mental illness in Iquitos, Peru (2013-2016)Implementação e funcionamento de residências terapêuticas para pessoas com transtornos mentais graves em Iquitos, Peru (2013-2016)].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- "Cultural brokerage" and beyond: piloting the role of an urban Aboriginal Mental Health Liaison Officer.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Development of a scoring system for non-specialist ratings of clinical competence in global mental health: a qualitative process evaluation of the Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (ENACT) scale.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2015Article
- Article
- Who are the key players in a new translational research network?BMC health services research · 2013Article
- Quality of communication between primary health care and mental health care: an examination of referral and discharge letters.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2012Review
- Shared care in mental illness: A rapid review to inform implementation.International journal of mental health systems · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care services have not generally been effective in meeting mental health care needs. There is evidence that collaboration between primary care and specialist mental health services can improve clinical and organisational outcomes. It is not clear however what factors enable or hinder effective collaboration. The objective of this study was to examine the factors that enable effective collaboration between specialist mental health services and primary mental health care.
methodsA narrative and thematic review of English language papers published between 1998 and 2009. An expert reference group helped formulate strategies for policy makers. Studies of descriptive and qualitative design from Australia, New Zealand, UK, Europe, USA and Canada were included. Data were extracted on factors reported as enablers or barriers to development of service linkages. These were tabulated by theme at clinical and organisational levels and the inter-relationship between themes was explored.
resultsA thematic analysis of 30 papers found the most frequently cited group of factors was "partnership formation", specifically role clarity between health care workers. Other factor groups supporting clinical partnership formation were staff support, clinician attributes, clinic physical features and evaluation and feedback. At the organisational level a supportive institutional environment of leadership and change management was important. The expert reference group then proposed strategies for collaboration that would be seen as important, acceptable and feasible. Because of the variability of study types we did not exclude on quality and findings are weighted by the number of studies. Variability in local service contexts limits the generalisation of findings.
conclusionThe findings provide a framework for health planners to develop effective service linkages in primary mental health care. Our expert reference group proposed five areas of strategy for policy makers that address organisational level support, joint clinical problem solving, local joint care guidelines, staff training and supervision and feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.