ArticleHealth research policy and systems2011
A novel performance monitoring framework for health research systems: experiences of the National Institute for Health Research in England.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- What funders are doing to assess the impact of their investments in health and biomedical research.Health research policy and systems · 2022Review
- Strategy management in collaborative clinical research partnerships.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Health research systems in change: the case of 'Push the Pace' in the National Institute for Health Research.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- 'Knowledge for better health' revisited - the increasing significance of health research systems: a review by departing Editors-in-Chief.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Article
- Going for growth: improvement in the infrastructural and management support for clinical academic research.BMJ quality improvement reports · 2015Article
- Four centuries on from Bacon: progress in building health research systems to improve health systems?Health research policy and systems · 2014Article
- Article
- Assessing research impact in academic clinical medicine: a study using Research Excellence Framework pilot impact indicators.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- Contribution mapping: a method for mapping the contribution of research to enhance its impact.Health research policy and systems · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) was established in 2006 with the aim of creating an applied health research system embedded within the English National Health Service (NHS). NIHR sought to implement an approach for monitoring its performance that effectively linked early indicators of performance with longer-term research impacts. We attempted to develop and apply a conceptual framework for defining appropriate key performance indicators for NIHR.
methodFollowing a review of relevant literature, a conceptual framework for defining performance indicators for NIHR was developed, based on a hybridisation of the logic model and balanced scorecard approaches. This framework was validated through interviews with key NIHR stakeholders and a pilot in one division of NIHR, before being refined and applied more widely. Indicators were then selected and aggregated to create a basket of indicators aligned to NIHR's strategic goals, which could be reported to NIHR's leadership team on a quarterly basis via an oversight dashboard.
resultsSenior health research system managers and practitioners endorsed the conceptual framework developed and reported satisfaction with the breadth and balance of indicators selected for reporting.
conclusionsThe use of the hybrid conceptual framework provides a pragmatic approach to defining performance indicators that are aligned to the strategic aims of a health research system. The particular strength of this framework is its capacity to provide an empirical link, over time, between upstream activities of a health research system and its long-term strategic objectives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.