Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21435222›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2011

Prognostic impact of CD168 expression in gastric cancer.

Sumiya Ishigami, Shinichi Ueno, Yuka Nishizono, Masataka Matsumoto, Hiroshi Kurahara, Takaaki Arigami, Yasuto Uchikado, Tetsuro Setoyama, Hideo Arima, Kita Yoshiaki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMTM6, a potential immunotherapy target.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of extra cellular proteins in gastric cancer progression and metastasis: an update.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2020
    Review
  14. Oncotarget · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Hyaluronic acid in digestive cancers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sumiya IshigamiDigestive Surgery Surgical Oncology, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan. ishiga@m.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp
Shinichi Ueno
Yuka Nishizono
Masataka Matsumoto
Hiroshi Kurahara
Takaaki Arigami
Yasuto Uchikado
Tetsuro Setoyama
Hideo Arima
Kita Yoshiaki
Yuko Kijima
Masaki Kitazono
Shoji Natsugoe
Kagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInteractions of stromal hyaluronic acid (HA) with its binding protein RHAMM (receptor for HA-mediated motility) (CD168) have been reported to affect tumor extension and the migration of crucial molecules to promote tumor progression and metastases. Cancerous CD168 expression is correlated with aggressive biological features in several cancers. However, the clinical implications of CD168 positivity in gastric cancer have remained unclear.

methodsWe examined the CD168 expression of 196 consecutive gastric cancer patients by immunohistochemistry. According to CD168 positivity, the 196 gastric cancer patients were divided into two groups (57 CD168-positive and 139 CD168-negative patients). The correlation between CD168 expression and clinicopathological factors (age, sex, histology, tumor depth, lymph node status, and vessel invasion) was evaluated according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma.

resultsCancerous CD168 expression was detectable in 57 of the 196 tumors (29%). CD168 positivity was significantly correlated with the depth of invasion, nodal involvement, and vessel invasion (p < 0.01). Survival analysis of the 196 gastric cancer patients showed that the CD168-positive group had a significantly higher mortality than the CD168-negative group (p < 0.01). In terms of a correlation with CD168 positivity at separate clinical stages, a significance difference was only found in stages II and III. Multivariate analysis revealed that CD168 expression was a significant independent prognostic marker (p = 0.013) after depth of invasion (p < 0.005) and nodal involvement (p < 0.01).

conclusionOur results suggest that cancerous CD168 positivity is strongly related to the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer tumors. These results suggest that cancerous CD168 expression can be used as a prognostic marker of gastric cancer owing to its interactions with stromal hyaluronic acid.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaDisease ProgressionExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic AcidImmunochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorExtracellular Matrix Proteinshyaluronan-mediated motility receptorHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21435222
PMCPMC3076262
OpenAlexW1983572960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.