Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21434798›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2011

ELISpot for measuring human immune responses to vaccines.

Meredith Slota, Jong-Baeck Lim, Yushe Dang, Mary L Disis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Is the "3+3" dose-escalation phase I clinical trial design suitable for therapeutic cancer vaccine development? A recommendation for alternative design.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Translational investigations in the HN1901 phase II window-of-opportunity study investigating the biological activity of an IDO1 (IO102) and PD-L1 (IO103) immune-modulatory peptide cancer vaccines in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Predicting SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meredith SlotaTumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, 815 Mercer Street, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98058, USA.
Jong-Baeck Lim
Yushe Dang
Mary L Disis

Funding

INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Immunologic Correlates of Immunization for CancerU54CA090818 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2001 to 2006
$5.5M
Optimized ex vivo expansion of anti-tumor Th1 and Tc1 for adoptive immunotherapy.R01CA136632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI COHEN, PETER A, DISIS, MARY L. · 2009 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS P50CA083636NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136632NCI NIH HHS R01CA136632NCI NIH HHS U54 CA090818NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assay is one of the most commonly used methods to measure antigen-specific T cells in both mice and humans. Some of the primary reasons for the popularity of the method are that ELISpot is highly quantitative, can measure a broad range of magnitudes of response and is capable of assessing critical cellular immune-related activities such as IFN-γ secretion and granzyme B release. Furthermore, ELISpot is adaptable not only to the evaluation of a variety of T-cell functions, but also to B cells and innate immune cells. It is no wonder that ELISpot has evolved from a research tool to a clinical assay. Recent Phase I and II studies of cancer vaccines, tested in a variety of malignancies, have suggested that ELISpot may be a useful biomarker assay to predict clinical benefit after therapeutic immune modulation. This article will discuss the most common applications of ELISpot, overview the efforts that have been undertaken to standardize the assay and apply the method in the analysis of human clinical trials, and describe some important steps in the process of developing a clinical-grade ELISpot.

Indexed as

AntigensCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayGranzymesHumansInterferon-gammaT-LymphocytesVaccinesAntigensCancer VaccinesGranzymesInterferon-gammaVaccines

Identifiers

PMID21434798
PMCPMC3360522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.