Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21432867›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2011

PC3 is a cell line characteristic of prostatic small cell carcinoma.

Sheng Tai, Yin Sun, Jill M Squires, Hong Zhang, William K Oh, Chao-Zhao Liang, Jiaoti Huang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 287 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
287citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

287 citing papers in PubMed, 482 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC)-associatedCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fumiquinazolines F and G from the FungusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article

227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheng TaiDepartment of Pathology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Biology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1732, USA.
Yin Sun
Jill M Squires
Hong Zhang
William K Oh
Chao-Zhao Liang
Jiaoti Huang
Broad Center · USAnhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
UCLA SPORE IN PROSTATE CANCERP50CA092131 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREEMAN, MICHAEL R · 2002 to 2023
$42.6M
UCLA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033176 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2011 to 2011
$15.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092131NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of the prostatic cancers are adenocarcinomas characterized by glandular formation and the expression of luminal differentiation markers androgen receptor (AR) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Most adenocarcinomas are indolent and androgen-dependent. Hormonal therapy that inhibits AR signaling produces symptomatic relief in patients with advanced and metastatic adenocarcinomas. Prostatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNC) is a variant form of prostate cancer (PC). In contrast to adenocarcinoma, the tumor cells of SCNC do not form glands and are negative for AR and PSA. SCNC is extremely aggressive and does not respond to hormonal therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the important and relevant features of two most commonly used PC cell lines, LNCaP and PC3, with prostatic adenocarcinoma and SCNC.

methodsXenograft tumors of LNCaP and PC3 were prepared and compared with human prostatic adenocarcinoma and SCNC for the expression of key signaling molecules by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis.

resultsLNCaP cells express AR and PSA and their growth is inhibited by androgen withdrawal, similar to human prostatic adenocarcinoma. PC3 cells do not express AR and PSA and their proliferation is independent of androgen, similar to SCNC. Adenocarcinoma cells and LNCaP cells are negative for neuroendocrine markers and stem cell-associated marker CD44 while SCNC and PC3 cells are positive. LNCaP cells have identical cytokeratin profiles to adenocarcinoma while PC3 cells have cytokeratin profiles similar to SCNC.

conclusionLNCaP cells share common features with adenocarcinoma while PC3 cells are characteristic of SCNC.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorAdenocarcinomaAnimalsBlotting, WesternCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Small CellHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMice, SCIDNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentNeoplasm TransplantationProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenAR protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenReceptors, AndrogenRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID21432867
PMCPMC3426349
OpenAlexW1984736888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.