Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21431984›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2011

Community-based participatory development, implementation, and evaluation of a cancer screening educational intervention among American Indians in the Northern Plains.

Krishnan Subrahmanian, Daniel G Petereit, Shalini Kanekar, Linda Burhansstipanov, Sarah Esmond, Raylene Miner, Caroline Spotted Tail, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Approach and Methods of the 2016 Alaska Native Research Forum.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Recommendations for Cancer Epidemiologic Research in Understudied Populations and Implications for Future Needs.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
  9. Engaging Canadian First Nations Women in Cervical Screening through Education.International journal of health promotion and education · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Krishnan SubrahmanianStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Daniel G Petereit
Shalini Kanekar
Linda Burhansstipanov
Sarah Esmond
Raylene Miner
Caroline Spotted Tail
B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
Rapid City Regional Hospital · USNative American Cancer Research · USPalo Alto University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Walking Forward - American Indian Participation in Cancer Clinical TrialsU54CA142157 · NCI · RAPID CITY REGIONAL HOSPITAL · PI PETEREIT, DANIEL G · 2009 to 2013
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5U56CA99010NCI NIH HHS U54 CA142157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study describes the creation and implementation of a culturally appropriate cancer education intervention, and assesses its efficacy among American Indians in a community with documented cancer-related disparities. Education workshops were developed and conducted on three western South Dakota reservations and in Rapid City by trained community representatives. Over 400 individuals participated in the 2-h workshops. Participants answered demographic questions, questions about previous cancer screening (to establish baseline screening rates), and completed a pre- and post-workshop quiz to assess learning. Participants demonstrated significant increases in cancer screening-related knowledge levels. Surveys reveal that participants found the information of high quality, great value and would recommend the program to friends. Pre-workshop data reveals cancer screening rates well below the national average. Workshop participants increased their knowledge about cancer etiology and screening. This intervention may represent an effective tool for increasing cancer screening utilization among American Indians.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21431984
PMCPMC3162121
OpenAlexW2079100339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.