Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21431886›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2011

Identity, fate and potential of cells grown as neurospheres: species matters.

Carolin Steffenhagen, Sabrina Kraus, Franz-Xaver Dechant, Mahesh Kandasamy, Bernadette Lehner, Anne-Maria Poehler, Tanja Furtner, Florian A Siebzehnrubl, Sebastien Couillard-Despres, Olaf Strauss and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel test strategies for in vitro seizure liability assessment.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carolin SteffenhagenInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Sabrina Kraus
Franz-Xaver Dechant
Mahesh Kandasamy
Bernadette Lehner
Anne-Maria Poehler
Tanja Furtner
Florian A Siebzehnrubl
Sebastien Couillard-Despres
Olaf Strauss
Ludwig Aigner
Francisco J Rivera

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that adult neurogenesis and gliogenesis follow the same principles through the mammalian class. However, it has been reported that neurogenesis might differ between species, even from the same order, like in rodents. Currently, it is not known if neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) from various species differ in their cell identity and potential. NSPCs can be expanded ex vivo as neurospheres (NSph), a model widely used to study neurogenesis in vitro. Here we demonstrate that rat (r) and mouse (m) NSph display different cell identities, differentiation fate, electrophysiological function and tumorigenic potential. Adult rNSph consist mainly of oligodendroglial progenitors (OPCs), which after repeated passaging proliferate independent of mitogens, whereas adult mNSph show astroglial precursor-like characteristics and retain their mitogen dependency. Most of the cells in rNSph express OPC markers and spontaneously differentiate into oligodendrocytes after growth factor withdrawal. Electrophysiological analysis confirmed OPC characteristics. mNSph have different electrophysiological properties, they express astrocyte precursor markers and spontaneously differentiate primarily into astrocytes. Furthermore, rNSph have the potential to differentiate into oligodendrocytes and astrocytes, whereas mNSph are restricted to the astrocytic lineage. The phenotypic differences between rNSph and mNSph were not due to a distinct response to species specific derived growth factors and are probably not caused by autocrine mechanisms. Our findings suggest that NSph derived from adult rat and mouse brains display different cell identities. Thus, results urge for caution when data derived from NSph are extrapolated to other species or to the in vivo situation, especially when aimed towards the clinical use of human NSph.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsAstrocytesBiomarkersCell AdhesionCell AggregationCell CountCell Culture TechniquesCell LineageCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChromosomes, MammalianCulture Media, ConditionedElectrophysiologyFemaleMembrane PotentialsBiomarkersCulture Media, Conditioned

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.