Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21431833›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2011

Selectable genetic markers for nematode transgenesis.

Rosina Giordano-Santini, Denis Dupuy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-Omics Integrative Analysis to Reveal the Impacts ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Subcellular Imaging of Neuronal Calcium Handling In Vivo.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. RNAi screening to identify postembryonic phenotypes in C. elegans.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. An antibiotic selection marker for schistosome transgenesis.International journal for parasitology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rosina Giordano-SantiniGenome Regulation and Evolution, Inserm U869, Université de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie (IECB), Pessac 33607, France.
Denis Dupuy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been used to study genetics and development since the mid-1970s. Over the years, the arsenal of techniques employed in this field has grown steadily in parallel with the number of researchers using this model. Since the introduction of C. elegans transgenesis, nearly 20 years ago, this system has been extensively used in areas such as rescue experiments, gene expression studies, and protein localization. The completion of the C. elegans genome sequence paved the way for genome-wide studies requiring higher throughput and improved scalability than provided by traditional genetic markers. The development of antibiotic selection systems for nematode transgenesis addresses these requirements and opens the possibility to apply transgenesis to investigate biological functions in other nematode species for which no genetic markers had been developed to date.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrug Resistance, MicrobialGenetic MarkersModels, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID21431833
PMCPMC11115105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.