Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21431416›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2011

A phase I study of tasisulam sodium (LY573636 sodium), a novel anticancer compound in patients with refractory solid tumors.

George R Simon, Robert L Ilaria, Mika A Sovak, Charles C Williams, Eric B Haura, Ann L Cleverly, Amanda K Sykes, Margaret M Wagner, Dinesh P de Alwis, Christopher A Slapak and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reactive Palladium-Ligand Complexes forPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George R SimonH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. simong@musc.edu
Robert L Ilaria
Mika A Sovak
Charles C Williams
Eric B Haura
Ann L Cleverly
Amanda K Sykes
Margaret M Wagner
Dinesh P de Alwis
Christopher A Slapak
Mary A Miller
David R Spriggs
Eli Lilly (United States) · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis phase I study was carried out to determine the phase II recommended dose of tasisulam sodium (hereafter, tasisulam), a novel anticancer agent with a unique mechanism of action.

methodsTasisulam was administered intravenously, every 21 days, in patients with refractory solid tumors using a three-plus-three dose-escalation schema.

resultsFifty-three patients were enrolled; the first 34 were treated with a flat dose of tasisulam of up to 2,400 mg, the dose level at which all three patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Controlling for C(max) proved important to reduce the risk of toxicity; therefore, we initially focused on identifying which parameters explained C(max) (end-of-infusion concentration) variability. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that C(max) negatively correlates with lean body weight (LBW). Thus, the dosing regimen was revised using a LBW-based algorithm targeting a specific C(max). A loading/chronic dose paradigm was then implemented as pharmacokinetic results revealed a long terminal half-life of tasisulam, likely because of its high-affinity albumin binding. C(max)-based dose escalation was stopped at the 420-μg/mL cohort, in which one of the 16 patients had DLT (transient hepatic transaminase elevation); grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was noted in later cycles in three patients. Although response was not a primary objective, 33% of heavily pretreated patients with post-dose radiological assessments had stable disease.

conclusionImplementation of a novel targeted C(max)-based dosing regimen allowed for the recommendation of a phase II tasisulam dose (loading dose of 420 μg/mL targeted C(max) with all subsequent doses administered at 65% of chronic dose given every 21 days) despite pharmacological challenges posed by high albumin binding.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesChromatography, LiquidFemaleHalf-LifeHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesN-((5-bromo-2-thienyl)sulfonyl)-2,4-dichlorobenzamideSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID21431416
PMCPMC3215883
OpenAlexW2100483340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.