Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21431398›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2011

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-based targeting using bombesin analogues is superior to metabolism-based targeting using choline for in vivo imaging of human prostate cancer xenografts.

Rogier P J Schroeder, W M van Weerden, E P Krenning, C H Bangma, S Berndsen, C H Grievink-de Ligt, H C Groen, S Reneman, E de Blois, W A P Breeman and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Advances of radiolabeled GRPR ligands for PET/CT imaging of cancers.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ⁸⁹Zr-huJ591 immuno-PET imaging in patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. A comparative study of radiolabeled bombesin analogs for the PET imaging of prostate cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2013
    Article
  16. Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2012
    Review
  17. Radiolabelled peptides for oncological diagnosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rogier P J SchroederDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.schroeder@erasmusmc.nl
W M van Weerden
E P Krenning
C H Bangma
S Berndsen
C H Grievink-de Ligt
H C Groen
S Reneman
E de Blois
W A P Breeman
M de Jong
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate cancer (PC) is a major health problem. Overexpression of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in PC, but not in the hyperplastic prostate, provides a promising target for staging and monitoring of PC. Based on the assumption that cancer cells have increased metabolic activity, metabolism-based tracers are also being used for PC imaging. We compared GRPR-based targeting using the (68)Ga-labelled bombesin analogue AMBA with metabolism-based targeting using (18)F-methylcholine ((18)F-FCH) in nude mice bearing human prostate VCaP xenografts.

methodsPET and biodistribution studies were performed with both (68)Ga-AMBA and (18)F-FCH in all VCaP tumour-bearing mice, with PC-3 tumour-bearing mice as reference. Scanning started immediately after injection. Dynamic PET scans were reconstructed and analysed quantitatively. Biodistribution of tracers and tissue uptake was expressed as percent of injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g).

resultsAll tumours were clearly visualized using (68)Ga-AMBA. (18)F-FCH showed significantly less contrast due to poor tumour-to-background ratios. Quantitative PET analyses showed fast tumour uptake and high retention for both tracers. VCaP tumour uptake values determined from PET at steady-state were 6.7 ± 1.4%ID/g (20-30 min after injection, N = 8) for (68)Ga-AMBA and 1.6 ± 0.5%ID/g (10-20 min after injection, N = 8) for (18)F-FCH, which were significantly different (p <0.001). The results in PC-3 tumour-bearing mice were comparable. Biodistribution data were in accordance with the PET results showing VCaP tumour uptake values of 9.5 ± 4.8%ID/g (N = 8) for (68)Ga-AMBA and 2.1 ± 0.4%ID/g (N = 8) for (18)F-FCH. Apart from the GRPR-expressing organs, uptake in all organs was lower for (68)Ga-AMBA than for (18)F-FCH.

conclusionTumour uptake of (68)Ga-AMBA was higher while overall background activity was lower than observed for (18)F-FCH in the same PC-bearing mice. These results suggest that peptide receptor-based targeting using the bombesin analogue AMBA is superior to metabolism-based targeting using choline for scintigraphy of PC.

Indexed as

AnimalsBombesinCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticCholineFluorine RadioisotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiceOligopeptidesPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, BombesinBombesinCholineDO3A-CH2CO-G-4-aminobenzoyl-Q-W-A-V-G-H-L-M-NH2Fluorine RadioisotopesGallium RadioisotopesmethylcholineOligopeptidesReceptors, Bombesin

Identifiers

PMID21431398
PMCPMC3104004
OpenAlexW2117749004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.