Molecular biology: A fly in the face of genomics.

Eileen E M Furlong

Abstract readNewsComment

In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

6citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

Genome-wide identification and characterisation of HOT regions in the human genome.BMC genomics · 2016
Article
Functional annotation of HOT regions in the human genome: implications for human disease and cancer.Scientific reports · 2015
Article
Physiological strategies during animal diapause: lessons from brine shrimp and annual killifish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2015
Review
Genomics: Hiding in plain sight.Nature · 2014
Article
Transcription and redox enzyme activities: comparison of equilibrium and disequilibrium levels in the three-spined stickleback.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2013
Article
HOT regions function as patterned developmental enhancers and have a distinct cis-regulatory signature.Genes & development · 2012
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Comment on
Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster.2011
Comment on
The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster.2011
Comment on
A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome.2011

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eileen E M Furlong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell LineChromatinDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGenes, InsectGenome, InsectPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Promoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsChromatinDrosophila ProteinsPc protein, DrosophilaPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21430772

DOI10.1038/471458a

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.