Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21430260›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2011

Effect of immunohistochemistry on molecular analysis of tissue samples: implications for microdissection technologies.

Michael A Tangrea, Sumana Mukherjee, Bing Gao, Sanford P Markey, Qiang Du, Michael Armani, Matthew S Kreitman, Alex M Rosenberg, Benjamin S Wallis, Franziska C Eberle and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Antigen Retrieval on Genomic DNA From Immunodissected Samples.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Optimized expression-based microdissection of formalin-fixed lung cancer tissue.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Immunoguided microdissection techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael A TangreaPathogenetics Unit, Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Sumana Mukherjee
Bing Gao
Sanford P Markey
Qiang Du
Michael Armani
Matthew S Kreitman
Alex M Rosenberg
Benjamin S Wallis
Franziska C Eberle
Francesca C Duncan
Jeffrey C Hanson
Rodrigo F Chuaqui
Jaime Rodriguez-Canales
Michael R Emmert-Buck

Funding

Subcellular Microdissection for the Identification of Organelle ProteinsZIAMH002919 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARKEY, SANFORD P · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser-based tissue microdissection is an important tool for the molecular evaluation of histological sections. The technology has continued to advance since its initial commercialization in the 1990s, with improvements in many aspects of the process. More recent developments are tailored toward an automated, operator-independent mode that relies on antibodies as targeting probes, such as immuno-laser capture microdissection or expression microdissection (xMD). Central to the utility of expression-based dissection techniques is the effect of the staining process on the biomolecules in histological sections. To investigate this issue, the authors analyzed DNA, RNA, and protein in immunostained, microdissected samples. DNA was the most robust molecule, exhibiting no significant change in quality after immunostaining but a variable 50% to 75% decrease in the total yield. In contrast, RNA in frozen and ethanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples was susceptible to hydrolysis and digestion by endogenous RNases during the initial steps of staining. Proteins from immunostained tissues were successfully analyzed by one-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry but were less amenable to solution phase assays. Overall, the results suggest investigators can use immunoguided microdissection methods for important analytic techniques; however, continued improvements in staining protocols and molecular extraction methods are key to further advancing the capability of these methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMass SpectrometryMiceParaffin EmbeddingProteinsRatsRNADNAProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID21430260
PMCPMC3201191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.