Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21429200›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2011

Controlling patient participation during robot-assisted gait training.

Alexander Koenig, Ximena Omlin, Jeannine Bergmann, Lukas Zimmerli, Marc Bolliger, Friedemann Müller, Robert Riener

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  11. A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  12. Difficulty adaptation in a competitive arm rehabilitation game using real-time control of arm electromyogram and respiration.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assist-as-Needed Robot-Aided Gait Training Improves Walking Function in Individuals Following Stroke.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2015
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Technological advances in interventions to enhance poststroke gait.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander KoenigSensory-Motor Systems Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. koenig@mavt.ethz.ch
Ximena Omlin
Jeannine Bergmann
Lukas Zimmerli
Marc Bolliger
Friedemann Müller
Robert Riener
ETH Zurich · CHSchön Klinik Bad Aibling · DEHocoma (Switzerland) · CHUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe overall goal of this paper was to investigate approaches to controlling active participation in stroke patients during robot-assisted gait therapy. Although active physical participation during gait rehabilitation after stroke was shown to improve therapy outcome, some patients can behave passively during rehabilitation, not maximally benefiting from the gait training. Up to now, there has not been an effective method for forcing patient activity to the desired level that would most benefit stroke patients with a broad variety of cognitive and biomechanical impairments.

methodsPatient activity was quantified in two ways: by heart rate (HR), a physiological parameter that reflected physical effort during body weight supported treadmill training, and by a weighted sum of the interaction torques (WIT) between robot and patient, recorded from hip and knee joints of both legs. We recorded data in three experiments, each with five stroke patients, and controlled HR and WIT to a desired temporal profile. Depending on the patient's cognitive capabilities, two different approaches were taken: either by allowing voluntary patient effort via visual instructions or by forcing the patient to vary physical effort by adapting the treadmill speed.

resultsWe successfully controlled patient activity quantified by WIT and by HR to a desired level. The setup was thereby individually adaptable to the specific cognitive and biomechanical needs of each patient.

conclusionBased on the three successful approaches to controlling patient participation, we propose a metric which enables clinicians to select the best strategy for each patient, according to the patient's physical and cognitive capabilities. Our framework will enable therapists to challenge the patient to more activity by automatically controlling the patient effort to a desired level. We expect that the increase in activity will lead to improved rehabilitation outcome.

Indexed as

RoboticsStroke RehabilitationAdultElectrophysiologyExercise TestExercise TherapyFemaleGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPatient ParticipationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21429200
PMCPMC3076234
OpenAlexW2134237515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.