ArticleBlood pressure2011
Systematic polymorphism discovery after genome-wide identification of potential susceptibility loci in a hereditary rodent model of human hypertension.
Article in Blood pressure, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pancreatic source of protease activity in the spontaneously hypertensive rat and its reduction during temporary food restriction.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2019Article
- Polymorphisms at the F12 and KLKB1 loci have significant trait association with activation of the renin-angiotensin system.BMC medical genetics · 2016Article
- Pulse Pressure Magnifies the Effect of COMT Val(158)Met on 15 Years Episodic Memory Trajectories.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Article
- MicroRNA-22 and promoter motif polymorphisms at the Chga locus in genetic hypertension: functional and therapeutic implications for gene expression and the pathogenesis of hypertension.Human molecular genetics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic strategies such as linkage analysis and quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping have identified a multitude of loci implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). While several candidate genetic regions have been identified in the SHR and its control, the Wistar-Kyoto rat (WKY), systematic follow-up of candidate identification with polymorphism discovery has not been widespread. In the current report, we develop a data-mining strategy to identify candidate genes for hypertension in the SHR, and then sequence each gene in the SHR and WKY strains. We integrate blood pressure QTL data, microarray data and data-mining methods. First, we determined the set of genes differentially expressed in SHR and WKY adrenal glands. Next, the chromosomal position of all differentially expressed genes was compared with peak marker position of all reported SHR blood pressure QTLs. We also identified the set of differentially expressed genes with the most extreme fold-change. Finally, the QTL positional candidates and the genes with extreme differential expression were proposed as candidate genes if they had biologically plausible roles in hypertensive pathology. We identified seven candidate genes that merit resequencing (catechol-O-methyltransferase [Comt], chromogranin A [Chga], dopamine beta-hydroxylase [Dbh], electron transferring flavoprotein dehydrogenase [Etfdh], endothelin receptor type B [Ednrb], neuropeptide Y [Npy] and phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase [Pnmt]), and then discovered polymorphism in four of these seven candidate genes. Chga is proposed as the strongest candidate for additional functional investigation. Our method for candidate gene identification is portable and can be applied to microarray data from any tissue, in any disease model with a QTL database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.