Trial reportDrugs & aging2011
Effects of medication review on drug-related problems in patients using automated drug-dispensing systems: a pragmatic randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Polymedication Check - Evaluation of the Impact of Community Pharmacy Based Medication Review on Medicines Use and Humanistic Outcomes
Durchführung Einer Beobachtungsstudie im Rahmen Einer Masterarbeit Zur Identifikation Von Pharmaceutical Care Issues Bei Patienten, Welche Mit Oralen Antikoagulantien Behandelt Werden
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to Address Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing for Older Primary Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions to Reduce Adverse Drug Reactions in Older Adults: An Update.Drugs & aging · 2023Pooled it
- Terms used to describe and define activities undertaken as a result of the medication review process: Do they require standardisation? A systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Pooled it
- The effectiveness and cost of integrating pharmacists within general practice to optimize prescribing and health outcomes in primary care patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review.BMC primary care · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence of adverse drug reactions in the primary care setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Deprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of Interventions to Reduce Adverse Drug Reactions in Older Adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of the outcomes reported in trials of medication review in older patients: the need for a core outcome set.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of medication review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC family practice · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Automated dose dispensing service for primary healthcare patients: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Pooled it
- Deprescribing in older patients with hyperpolypharmacy: a cluster-randomised trial in primary care.Age and ageing · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of clinical pharmacy services in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment in a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of medication review on the number of drug-related problems in patients visiting the outpatient cardiology clinic: A randomized controlled trial.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- DREAMeR: Drug use Reconsidered in the Elderly using goal Attainment scales during Medication Review; study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2018Trial
- Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Trial
- Effectiveness of Pharmacy Automation Systems Versus Traditional Systems in Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- A survey on the implementation of clinical medication reviews in community pharmacies within a multidisciplinary setting.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are concerns that automated drug dispensing may increase inappropriate drug use. Automated dispensing could lead to perpetual repeating of drug therapies without the necessary re-evaluation.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of a pharmacist-led medication review on drug-related problems (DRPs) in older patients receiving their drugs via automated dispensing.
methodsThis was a pragmatic randomized controlled study conducted in primary care. Patients were recruited from six Dutch community pharmacies. They were eligible if they lived at home, were aged ≥ 65 years, and used five or more different drugs, of which at least one had to be dispensed via an automated system. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a medication review at the start of the study (intervention group) or after 6 months (waiting-list group). Each patient was independently reviewed by two pharmacist reviewers. The results of these medication reviews were sent to the community pharmacist to be discussed with the patient's general practitioner (GP). The primary outcome measure was the number of DRPs leading to a recommendation for drug change. Secondary outcomes were the total number of drug changes and the number of drug changes related to a recommendation. In order to analyse drug changes, medication records were collected 6 months after the medication review or index date in the waiting-list group. Potential DRPs were classified using the DOCUMENT classification.
resultsThere were no baseline differences between the 63 patients in the intervention group and the 55 patients in the waiting-list group with respect to age, sex, number of drugs per patient and type of drug prescribed. The mean number of DRPs per patient at baseline in the intervention group and waiting list combined was 8.5, with no difference between the groups. At baseline, the mean number of DRPs leading to a recommendation for drug change was 4.5 per patient and did not differ between the two groups. After 6 months, the number of DRPs leading to a recommendation for drug change decreased by 29% in the intervention group versus 5% in the waiting-list group (p < 0.01). Recommendations for cessation of a drug were more frequently accepted than recommendations to add a new drug (82% vs 44%, p = 0.01).
conclusionsThis study shows that patients using automated drug dispensing have a high number of DRPs. Medication review decreases the number of DRPs among these patients. We recommend that all patients with automatic drug dispensing should have a thorough medication review by pharmacists and prescribers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.